Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751971AbWI3VVP (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:21:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751973AbWI3VVP (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:21:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:12235 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbWI3VVO (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:21:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:20:03 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: dtor@insightbb.com Cc: zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: appletouch vs. usbhid Message-Id: <20060930142003.8ba909b1.zaitcev@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.3; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 714 Lines: 19 Dear Dmitry: A user filed a bug here which seems to indicate that hid lacks needed exclusions for Apple pointers: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208721 Do you think we should be adding QUIRK_IGNORE for these? Perhaps conditional on CONFIG_USB_APPLETOUCH? We used to have those IGNORE quirks for Wacom, but then started to ignore all Wacoms. We seem to be not at that point with Apple yet, and also they have varying vendor IDs. Cheers, -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/