Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1975271pxb; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuA/ZaJIb51F1AyowCL7xXFqdt9c+b9EIvnJtJTwkCnE3vdQBUZAw/VH6DN9VxksWha5+1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:489:: with SMTP id f9mr1986189eja.428.1614947624499; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614947624; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HFyqP8st8eU83pfyjXwAlwbmjjOXSv0HPKqh5EphRIfwbKSDn4zeCOqUwCXzHH53o0 dQRcsfNHv6ZaHOnaWkDIywE9F0wN6abl7+JYD869bpi5BILjQ//fKU63YaGtSb4dIZfX +I30WxzhjW5Y8vLXUxPH36V8EBKYO9dMSPIddGjgIYN9AWoUtxeYkwL1WiuFtkaNlSzW K8grjZU/iV3BizbKAR4LGHHY7Si+qteN7G+N8ujxS6OqIsOysKUSTt/rigVamYKWuGln xrj/Hxl6mpxOsAUFDtYc9Li1BHhnbN6scsxVALPbD+vPxIWR/mII4iRnYbdx0wRKoXEF FRYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=LFXoeVqeR5N8coVo3Q0R/TthampT35RN/djVAiAtoY8=; b=C45fKYviP9v/adH6eIsaU1mWS7Uo1X8983/9Q5ioruAz/nbpIqeVNy5lmjFYeUY/6S 8qDtzU8AfcwXUTRQfTt5CNkhpueFliFLCtJKr7bG4ld0wtY8nLtrhpnYhid0bX+LB3wQ YOduzyPYUxzcAp2ALkAElsG3F4bp3cIwIYIeU5mrUKshds7xxstV0tagdr1S7uGkuu8q 9wHepf9lYNw79137gKxSAM3y0lBQliM8M3p+CAjpKmG8bDNgw5Tn6xhzPxr+Tcbm+R9L c5PJN6haDr0RQxqmNK/CYAaCq0/9aPdqb0U1y8bOUvH8biHx6MdaPy6+8eWVG+XWQDgI dNww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=tpfT2QUe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o26si1238733eja.611.2021.03.05.04.33.21; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 04:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=tpfT2QUe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232051AbhCEM3L (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:29:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37624 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232076AbhCEM2o (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:28:44 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0C5565013; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:28:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1614947324; bh=KKFEiqyIJJSnu8U2sU9rD4d5UqVxif6VaTUmGfcFVes=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tpfT2QUeq511idDhuL//+v55bio+zuC61BciZi9yxH/lzum4o4C2PQKUmUzaNcg2c M+4vt5N4v8UH6zQw+0CzPkbP+CgZ+L7ulKqZfeyzvAi2QiWoQaXBx3xw6ddJoFTDop bQ/KmwqFYMmPD08dsgYFFzLscGwfm2OLVAsYJDOU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.10 025/102] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:20:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20210305120904.522134789@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Vladimir Oltean commit 8043c845b63a2dd88daf2d2d268a33e1872800f0 upstream. Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that), so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of functionality. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/ Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644, \ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v, unsigned long mask) { - unsigned long flags; - - flags = p->flags; + unsigned long flags = p->flags; + int err; if (v) flags |= mask; @@ -65,6 +64,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_ flags &= ~mask; if (flags != p->flags) { + err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask); + if (err) + return err; + p->flags = flags; br_port_flags_change(p, mask); }