Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751433AbWI3WSb (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:18:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751438AbWI3WSb (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:18:31 -0400 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:34187 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751433AbWI3WS3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:18:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17694.60625.825317.341547@samba.org> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:16:49 +1000 To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement In-Reply-To: <20060930153241.GC6955@opteron.random> References: <1159498900.3880.31.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <17692.41932.957298.877577@cse.unsw.edu.au> <1159512998.3880.50.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <17692.53185.564741.502063@samba.org> <20060930153241.GC6955@opteron.random> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Reply-To: tridge@samba.org From: tridge@samba.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 20 Andrea, > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:48:17PM +1000, tridge@samba.org wrote: > > wishes. I'm not even 100% certain it would be legal. > > How can you not be sure that it would be legal? I am nearly sure it would be legal, but in some private discussions I've had I have heard some arguments about why it may not be legal. It may even depend on jurisdiction. So I'll be surprised if it turns out not to be legal, but it is something that is definately worth checking on. Cheers, Tridge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/