Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
References: <20210304175030.184131-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
To:     Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
        nathan@kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <147603.1614981032.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 05 Mar 2021 21:50:32 +0000
Message-ID: <147604.1614981032@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com> wrote:

> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_ASN1)				+= asn1_compiler
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT)		+= sign-file
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING)	+= extract-cert
>  hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_EXTRA_CERTIFICATE)	+= insert-sys-cert
> - hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING)	+= extract-cert
> +hostprogs-always-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST)	+= extract-cert

Hmmm...  We have extract-cert listed twice.  Does that matter, I wonder?

David