Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests_bpf: extend test_tc_tunnel test with
 vxlan
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc:     Xuesen Huang <hxseverything@gmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Xuesen Huang <huangxuesen@kuaishou.com>,
        Li Wang <wangli09@kuaishou.com>
References: <20210305123347.15311-1-hxseverything@gmail.com>
 <CA+FuTSc_RDHb8dmMzfwatt89pXsX2AA1--X98pEGkmmfpVs-Vg@mail.gmail.com>
 <dfde1c9f-cd2d-6e7d-ea3e-58b486a1388b@iogearbox.net>
 <CA+FuTSfk2HOupSwUfOjsNQBA4Z8HKUgfkQmyTViY5icbt4ujHg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Message-ID: <4730cd63-ba36-ae21-9a0d-5df108e7494a@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Sat, 6 Mar 2021 00:10:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSfk2HOupSwUfOjsNQBA4Z8HKUgfkQmyTViY5icbt4ujHg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/5/21 5:15 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/5/21 4:08 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:34 AM Xuesen Huang <hxseverything@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Xuesen Huang <huangxuesen@kuaishou.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_ENCAP_L2_ETH flag to the existing tests which
>>>> encapsulates the ethernet as the inner l2 header.
>>>>
>>>> Update a vxlan encapsulation test case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xuesen Huang <huangxuesen@kuaishou.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <wangli09@kuaishou.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>>>
>>> Please don't add my signed off by without asking.
>>
>> Agree, I can remove it if you prefer while applying and only keep the
>> ack instead.
> 
> That would be great. Thanks, Daniel!

Done & applied, thanks everyone!