Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.21-rc1 review
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        <linux@roeck-us.net>, <shuah@kernel.org>, <patches@kernelci.org>,
        <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>, <pavel@denx.de>,
        <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        <stable@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Samuel Zou <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <8d4fbde6-b004-2874-af2d-a10f20be4993@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 6 Mar 2021 14:25:44 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 2021/3/5 20:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.21 release.
> There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 07 Mar 2021 12:08:39 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.21-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Our test CI monitored the 5.10.21-rc1, and compile failure on arm64:

Kernel repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.10.y
Arch: arm64/x86
Version: 5.10.21-rc1+
Commit: 80aaabbaf433294d1f075981fa3785d7f4b55159
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)


arm64 (compile failure)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel build failed, error log:
kernel/rcu/tree.c:683:2: error: implicit declaration of function 
‘IRQ_WORK_INIT’; did you mean ‘QSTR_INIT’? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   QSTR_INIT
kernel/rcu/tree.c:683:2: error: invalid initializer


x86 (No kernel failures)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:
total_num: 4716
succeed_num: 4714
failed_num: 2
timeout_num: 0

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>