Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:12:05 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc:     bharat@chelsio.com, dledford@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: hw: cxgb4: fix error return code of
 pass_open_rpl()
Message-ID: <YESY5fG5a8sCRiS7@unreal>
References: <20210306135317.17803-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210306135317.17803-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 05:53:17AM -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> When ep is NULL, no error code of pass_open_rpl() is returned.
> To fix this bug, pass_open_rpl() returns -EINVAL in this case.

Why do you think that this is an error?
>
> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> index 8769e7aa097f..773d3805bb25 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cm.c
> @@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ static int pass_open_rpl(struct c4iw_dev *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
>  	if (!ep) {
>  		pr_warn("%s stid %d lookup failure!\n", __func__, stid);
> -		goto out;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	pr_debug("ep %p status %d error %d\n", ep,
>  		 rpl->status, status2errno(rpl->status));
> --
> 2.17.1
>