Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1432932pxb; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 19:07:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGI220dBhX/3cdhcr2rIGnl7N1ftdNYu6lBa6PVLJlmgHC80yUKM/zjsFVmSe2VT6Z3m68 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1352:: with SMTP id x18mr12686348ejb.545.1615172833846; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 19:07:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615172833; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L6lRPghtBXmSg+PdT4Wt21/aHQ1x9i3syKupR6rksx9jVjAYqS4/sGak7SJd92ThBC Gkv1EeQiNVKsME5R9Z/xx5HtqykR1t9YKxsRZXj0m9YgoqsnuiZXCX0HKYeInBqDLF8M /48SlW4uCcmc2DYbqeSZ2/0B4AQm48qEiBVh0Lc7I77I2PIuAJ7e7v8lfKXOIa3ikTCL z8NMrQtgaT83gnDj/vZXYgb9jFN4z7RU1bkWTi+ie8qJIxpTlEUlwSpQv6GkzZl85FcO YzQBfjgshZcdi1Fztyrs5FFVOR5chlJ3o/1JWT8ib93E1B5sfqQTahq1yE4cOfbZ737Y 5GHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=hTNVgVC5hotULQw8zIZhxJodmwIUemWiNuW1NlPZ8Gg=; b=eEH+gkoI2wfL5k7DocsGrZqePocS4GUua4i3gvCLanK8WPayldDw22jO2s3tBKIjXl 0nnCVLRhVV8nfeJQPmsiGqxYIfNGwygFkuxmiNFJGEj8PMAqELhnexPjmSQs603GF7wN nPaLVtgWxeBGwcIRewioBjAZet+vX9CrKoCpJFvtHCJY/mLrVpNOp3vLV1W/oLov2tOd arFKk+atG51SvhpfRd1qokCf8lQHdOi29IK/R+sp0cZAOJHfkdW1Xn4VAIEyj3sqLZ9N BbjiInahgEL/pM3+NJBZlJ6JTj6TTK5GQ50Tvh0rQ+l5G47HeLlTvmleZm93E1VvQ6zx h9EA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n20si6073620edq.273.2021.03.07.19.06.28; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 19:07:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232583AbhCGRSp (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 7 Mar 2021 12:18:45 -0500 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:49780 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232630AbhCGRS2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2021 12:18:28 -0500 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id F155C1C0B76; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 18:18:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 18:18:25 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Pavel Machek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/102] 5.10.21-rc1 review Message-ID: <20210307171824.GA22500@amd> References: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org> <20210305221030.GB27686@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210305221030.GB27686@amd> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.21 release. > > There are 102 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. >=20 > Here situation is similar to 4.4 >=20 > [ 27.349919] > Received signal: TEST_CASE_ID=3DCVE-2017-5715 RESULT=3Dfail >=20 > So I see some kind of failure, and this time I suspect real kernel > problem. >=20 > https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/171825 >=20 > 4.19 has similar problem: >=20 > https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/171812 >=20 > Again, Ccing Chris, but it looks like something is wrong there. It went away after I reran the tests, and the old tests failed due to timeout. So it looks like server with qemu was overloaded or something like that. There are still failures, but they are "boards not available" kind, so not a kernel problem. https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-= 5.10.y Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmBFCuAACgkQMOfwapXb+vLl1gCgtiAJQL+9+8BJavKH8SrLJ1xb KHYAn1HaW4nh2NQqvvYmD7Uxx7kmcZ7Y =acNo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--