Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:58:17 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Jing Xiangfeng <jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
        palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, rppt@kernel.org,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
        sudeep.holla@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org,
        song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com, ardb@kernel.org,
        anshuman.khandual@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com, guro@fb.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, frowand.list@gmail.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable v5.10 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA
Message-ID: <YEX1OcbVNSqwwusF@kroah.com>
References: <20210303073319.2215839-1-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com>
 <YEDkmj6cchMPAq2h@kroah.com>
 <9bc396116372de5b538d71d8f9ae9c3259f1002e.camel@suse.de>
 <YEDr/lYZHew88/Ip@kroah.com>
 <827b317d7f5da6e048806922098291faacdb19f9.camel@suse.de>
 <YETwL6QGWFyJTAzk@kroah.com>
 <604597E3.5000605@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <604597E3.5000605@huawei.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:20:03AM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/3/7 23:24, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 15:17 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > > > > Hi Greg.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 14:46 +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 03:33:12PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote:
> > > > > > > Using two distinct DMA zones turned out to be problematic. Here's an
> > > > > > > attempt go back to a saner default.
> > > > > > What problem does this solve?  How does this fit into the stable kernel
> > > > > > rules?
> > > > > We changed the way we setup memory zones in arm64 in order to cater for
> > > > > Raspberry Pi 4's weird DMA constraints: ZONE_DMA spans the lower 1GB of memory
> > > > > and ZONE_DMA32 the rest of the 32bit address space. Since you can't allocate
> > > > > memory that crosses zone boundaries, this broke crashkernel allocations on big
> > > > > machines. This series fixes all this by parsing the HW description and checking
> > > > > for DMA constrained buses. When not found, the unnecessary zone creation is
> > > > > skipped.
> > > > What kernel/commit caused this "breakage"?
> > > 1a8e1cef7603 arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
> > Thanks for the info, all now queued up.
> There is a fix in 5.11. Please consider applying the following commit to
> 5.10.y:
> 
> aed5041ef9a3 of: unittest: Fix build on architectures without
> CONFIG_OF_ADDRES

Thanks, now queued up.

greg k-h