Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1775752pxb; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:12:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyV5iqz2fYACQeQzkWlY2NfWejJlWK7vXN/XQ5L/Z3gs4N5dFgdSNYZ86/jDcl1zGyQY7eR X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:22b5:: with SMTP id cx21mr22439758edb.27.1615212758897; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 06:12:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615212758; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YZXmcAEAobhim177CyD+DI0sJx0VtoSBRYzx2W8HCbanXZFiEc4uKYz0/tP8/bVEFQ E1HQyr7lDq7iThYf1VLj4iIvsQkRKH2FV4Y1u9syLWkwEOha6uRysI+8oVDtrZSxwppK sWmlW5l+lDv1p39L7UXfHrOIRzCgh2K1bmVZq9sfcoiaOa1QrZdyPTayZFi7sXU1TLhb qH/AseZoN1svz3g8MX4v6myuLyyo1lQAlhheolxf1TBmIV5BnAexlxpq+RFOnls5QlPj a9yqhcroqtiTUfbyPOLgfK8IgrkW9pI3RqjPRLS+KPl+okAiye4L39I9ikvNiJRuOvz6 leNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=pbE7xUaOZUpTd375UrFXZhkfFNrYHw34Jke7GnznOGQ=; b=XBUgG4a4gLSDBnIsLsh19tspqCWOD2u50TFLfLlyh1afPduXSdk1ywV33jB3AISYXg 4lH/7yXeHDmzmFUw/6/IqRalCNA/51/JUvYM2s/u/8b7E3pf1ngzb9jBD2hP5ZpmObo+ T//+0amJtvVoiUsoiSiLikH7piCgCfHTMAwbEB03u235gjRd2WtnIkobj0k8eeVnCg+m VEV5kDf2gE9Z+MDM78njNSLlKYD3EcTpsdlBLRqgK8cKEzurLHmv1BUliIxOAm1eUElH NoylW3qnl1QT2cP5aqMB7No6fgtfbTv3HNVfHKZk7FE2V6P1q9nELqtq61qcld6X2RXY NqtQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=AmEVNKxK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt8si6790135ejc.111.2021.03.08.06.12.15; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 06:12:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=AmEVNKxK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230231AbhCHOLT (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:11:19 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38012 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229468AbhCHOLE (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:11:04 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1615212663; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pbE7xUaOZUpTd375UrFXZhkfFNrYHw34Jke7GnznOGQ=; b=AmEVNKxKn3lR7k0MSGq5MFHlmMPFI8Gsethwq6QHO33ZqkS2gJhixIzGUIZZt6nDeU5wZT Rfu20YmV/uNTcAnq1K8f4lkn+PzD7az7pv/56RQqO9wGviIeAla230+4OHtOAD9cvHVDux oO92keGhrZ4qGLmsJgq135Y+n7VDT2I= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE9E3AE15; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:11:02 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , joaodias@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: be more verbose for alloc_contig_range faliures Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 08-03-21 14:22:12, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 08.03.21 13:49, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > Earlier in the discussion I have suggested dynamic debugging facility. > > Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst. Have you tried to > > look into that direction? > > Did you see the previous mail this is based on: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YEEUq8ZRn4WyYWVx@google.com > > I agree that "nofail" is misleading. Rather something like > "dump_on_failure", just a better name :) Yeah, I have read through the email thread. I just do not get why we cannot make it pr_debug() and add -DDYNAMIC_DEBUG_MODULE for page_alloc.c (I haven't checked whether that is possible for built in compile units, maybe it is not but from a quick seems it should). I really do not like this to be a part of the API. alloc_contig_range is a best effort allocator. Complaining about failure is too noisy. I do agree that some sort of easy to enable debugging is due but please let's make it as transparent to the code as possible. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs