Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: csqNquLblrlaNYUhwdLyjE9B3x8cELNyG8MPsp8yB8gYqPJvGkOmcuoohdesSIS+qRg0XDmmHw
 q+6bx2+0aRiA==
IronPort-SDR: oC+ntWrJIAsk3CK3yOkmRRVNwsg9G++lUMJCqj9PPtc3AYngnfqVR0a1pifBvpqLAhPcj4FIo1
 86WDU6ZeME4A==
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 17:32:49 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] gpio: sim: new testing module
Message-ID: <YEZDod11xb0LT043@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20210304102452.21726-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <20210304102452.21726-10-brgl@bgdev.pl>
 <YEDdbfbM9abHJpIO@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAMRc=MdRxXzoZuyLs-24dXfOft=OQqDneTHa4-ZKqFE1kMBWcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YEIE1nG8lZ4V2MXq@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAMRc=MekGnK17rYf3Bx_UHumVVrpmJphOnMfO352NB9SaOJCGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <YEY9DFk6NEcnEWGE@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <CAMpxmJVTUfveuaY9yhP5PLXoOdrkYQ2WbE5-P+4XRi3=VdQKjg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJVTUfveuaY9yhP5PLXoOdrkYQ2WbE5-P+4XRi3=VdQKjg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:13:33PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 03:23:31PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:

...

> > I have strong opinion not to open code "yet another parser".
> >
> > So, grepping on 'strsep(.*, ",")' shows a lot of code that wants something like
> > this. Interesting are the net/9p cases. This in particular pointed out to
> > lib/parser.c which in turn shows promising match_strlcpy() / match_strdup(). I
> > haven't looked deeply though.
> >
> > That said, I agree that next_arg() is not the best here.
> 
> Shall we revisit this once it's upstream with a generalization for
> separating comma separated strings?

How can we guarantee it won't be forgotten?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko