Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>,
        'Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Cc:     Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20210305034930.3236099-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
References: <20210305034930.3236099-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: rt4831: Fix return value check in rt4831_regulator_probe()
Message-Id: <161521970194.10009.1692126803551238706.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 08 Mar 2021 16:08:21 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:49:30 +0000, 'Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function dev_get_regmap() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
> check should be replaced with NULL test.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: rt4831: Fix return value check in rt4831_regulator_probe()
      commit: 2a105d168e74eedbccd9b040c3ee8b8b00604a33

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark