Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1988583pxb; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:03:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1yQ0/Vl5c0dQQRr5xAduivZ7m5UsvGZZLoMVrPyePfTqFc6bH6U2K89CuQmeh6YyhfQcQ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1447:: with SMTP id q7mr17062028ejc.27.1615230184134; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:03:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615230184; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZdSOkx8TdKMSisfEkylT9/DP6aXWcHODzAGRatcvymIO2ttu3Hfbe3KaAq2/Qmi3Bm v6sLXfc0lLQ5E3O51CdSeZLsPqx7g/7voXWV+Eztv9tgZDRROa83+N+1s1/0FjWpvxQB FBxH0NreHHGsYM4tujxvhvhj7zruzDVvqM6Bdc2bHxzIa0Q9F6Yvi8foGlUjvhOVhoJg vLlGtwFgfu6Tm3UQhQZDEti6h47gIkPCH33JTfh8Q+ciApJnfDxDRoRjXEbhwnWdY7G/ DnopWYx0OdmbPgItes0k1CTcY5tVL4OuxDShk9FjIZSVaPHZtnHqJ2zLFVm8zY9P3E3T gFPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=u9D6St/hItgvsTOwsgXBjIrvb9weW06X9OS6jfum6qs=; b=Aj1GnqOCOXJxH6LnCJt6d/bT21UI1UCSwdL6VW00ZoNprxiDJL0KdXg8rASS/Pig+t xFLQZ71713vxdb05OTzk18bFF5kA4oSGIo4jWJP1DTk2e1vdrM9TTUuCG1HHm2mSwmoX x3ct9Vf8axXKo8zIyRCPZDsXtckyjmixaaUUyKvE4TAWabOy0GQ/79KvCT2bMSp02YMs qPz7J9iuXfGpLkAn7WXR4ak8HzLxB5WIBR1AppRHvZx2MM7HT688ixyQQLfVfoQb+fVP O2mm3v1v3LTGuFAYHsTq7y6hHxl0I45LYEeD3gMvNNt1d+SOq1DYYzUlQCDRuqPRjkdv Ag1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="y4kEONi/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c11si7984059ejz.595.2021.03.08.11.02.40; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="y4kEONi/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229904AbhCHTBJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:01:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230412AbhCHTAu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:00:50 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93980C061760 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id n9so6048238pgi.7 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:00:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u9D6St/hItgvsTOwsgXBjIrvb9weW06X9OS6jfum6qs=; b=y4kEONi/WwXRLrtFsqEOCbXzvfIIg8BZW6+4kApMz7hBA94NTlEYCEcdght3+m15+u LW3DBPZGaqzC7ZUgj2icKzPbf1DUZxrBX8bMHpgSprESxF8UcyAzSsJB3zq4tF9BpfGv TthMS9A1xC2oN+CYQDcncfrRwWvxMwJ1/SvGmztjfAa4Nm8eqpvapBve5880Ztk2aIgB mRwvAgu94VQdEY1+g8Bld7jwNo44kUsI72UYuEe0tu02SDeyXkxTUmw0ISu1uf4FnRo2 Q8AJeZCF3SCD7z9Uew8BXHahfOtlDvLS1myz3wGHoQUDLUeu4x0JpacoVHoelwmVenQG vvCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u9D6St/hItgvsTOwsgXBjIrvb9weW06X9OS6jfum6qs=; b=JTBzT2QMPvD1FZeXhd5FXihBJmzA88/tpWCDUIu9XzHsl4ORQwG1asODlszgMwL9L9 MjeWBoNBAb3IJtxj1xiy1QfuPTNhSZi8r3CzA3+sxKBFnq6MPGKi6m1oBANq+cV3b61H 0iiVU+NmxlzSQTtRuWB7L/0jH7q4Pb7fuSwjWo1CPnj5852mrc3ZbiBdStK9YqwXEUVh qw8jtiq/h4XIqH4rTlJw8v4X3XtxpAEd3XYLu4e7/1Omtmn0tW8Oa4F6QBxeJEcQSthZ dIGsZHv/HfqIfATOTej1+erU3ghqEtbBWwPpQJJpy9NxwlXok2ygFXZt4qDtr+YR23ks l6Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zCjIX9P+m6uJIFY/lm212YcNN09a+CtE0niJrH5Dn/7i2LBJz 2lV3FS6b3/ic8p1/wCCmnayrhw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5c1e:: with SMTP id q30mr21021443pgb.259.1615230049701; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:00:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps15 (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j27sm7694148pgn.61.2021.03.08.11.00.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:00:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:00:46 -0700 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Ben Levinsky Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, michal.simek@xilinx.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v26 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver Message-ID: <20210308190046.GA3983426@xps15> References: <20210223154447.13247-1-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> <20210223154447.13247-6-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210223154447.13247-6-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 07:44:47AM -0800, Ben Levinsky wrote: > R5 is included in Xilinx Zynq UltraScale MPSoC so by adding this > remoteproc driver, we can boot the R5 sub-system in two different > configurations - > * Split > * Lockstep > > The Xilinx R5 Remoteproc Driver boots the R5's via calls to the Xilinx > Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access > and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this > driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls. > > Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring > Signed-off-by: Jason Wu > Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky > --- > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 8 + > drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c | 954 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 963 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > index c6659dfea7c7..c2fe54b1d94f 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > @@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC > It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing > the DSP slave processors. > > +config ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC > + tristate "ZynqMP R5 remoteproc support" > + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP > + select RPMSG_VIRTIO > + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX > + help > + Say y or m here to support ZynqMP R5 remote processors via the remote > + processor framework. > endif # REMOTEPROC > > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > index 3dfa28e6c701..ef1abff654c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC) += zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.o > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..4bcff2daceaf > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > @@ -0,0 +1,954 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +/* > + * Zynq R5 Remote Processor driver > + * > + * Based on origin OMAP and Zynq Remote Processor driver > + * > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" > + > +#define MAX_RPROCS 2 /* Support up to 2 RPU */ > +#define MAX_MEM_PNODES 4 /* Max power nodes for one RPU memory instance */ > + > +#define BANK_LIST_PROP "sram" > +#define DDR_LIST_PROP "memory-region" > + > +/* IPI buffer MAX length */ > +#define IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX 32U > +/* RX mailbox client buffer max length */ > +#define RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX (IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX + \ > + sizeof(struct zynqmp_ipi_message)) > + > +/* > + * Map each Xilinx on-chip SRAM Bank address to their own respective > + * pm_node_id. > + * > + * size can differ based on R5 cluster configuration so record from > + * device tree in zynqmp_r5_probe. > + */ > +struct sram_addr_data { > + phys_addr_t addr; > + enum pm_node_id id; > + resource_size_t size; > +}; > + > +#define NUM_SRAMS 4U > +static const struct sram_addr_data zynqmp_banks[NUM_SRAMS] = { > + {0xffe00000UL, NODE_TCM_0_A, 0}, > + {0xffe20000UL, NODE_TCM_0_B, 0}, > + {0xffe90000UL, NODE_TCM_1_A, 0}, > + {0xffeb0000UL, NODE_TCM_1_B, 0}, > +}; > + > +/** > + * struct zynqmp_r5_rproc - ZynqMP R5 core structure > + * > + * @rx_mc_buf: rx mailbox client buffer to save the rx message > + * @srams : srams Xilinx mgmt IDs for srams that will be used by R5 core. > + * @tx_mc: tx mailbox client > + * @rx_mc: rx mailbox client > + * @mbox_work: mbox_work for the RPU remoteproc > + * @tx_mc_skbs: socket buffers for tx mailbox client > + * @rproc: rproc handle > + * @tx_chan: tx mailbox channel > + * @rx_chan: rx mailbox channel > + * @pnode_id: RPU CPU power domain id > + * @elem: linked list item > + */ > +struct zynqmp_r5_rproc { > + unsigned char rx_mc_buf[RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX]; > + struct sram_addr_data srams[NUM_SRAMS]; > + struct mbox_client tx_mc; > + struct mbox_client rx_mc; > + struct work_struct mbox_work; > + struct sk_buff_head tx_mc_skbs; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct mbox_chan *tx_chan; > + struct mbox_chan *rx_chan; > + u32 pnode_id; > + struct list_head elem; > +}; > + > +/* > + * r5_set_mode > + * @z_rproc: Remote processor private data > + * @rpu_mode: mode specified by device tree to configure the RPU to > + * > + * set RPU operation mode > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure > + */ > +static int r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc, > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode) > +{ > + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode; > + enum rpu_oper_mode cur_rpu_mode; > + int ret; > + > + ret = zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_mode(z_rproc->pnode_id, &cur_rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (rpu_mode != cur_rpu_mode) { > + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(z_rproc->pnode_id, rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP) ? > + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT; > + return zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(z_rproc->pnode_id, tcm_mode); > +} > + > +/* > + * r5_rproc_prepare > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * The Xilinx Versal and ZU+ SoC's require devices (in this case srams) to be > + * requested for a given device to be used. As the R5's TCM banks may be used > + * by the cores, each of these banks has to be requested before they can be > + * used. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + int ret, i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) { > + if (!z_rproc->srams[i].id) > + continue; > + > + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(z_rproc->srams[i].id, > + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * r5_rproc_unprepare > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complementary > + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. This instructs the power > + * management controller that the node is no longer needed by that cluster, > + * allowing the node to be placed into an inactive state. The cores > + * themselves are only halted in the .stop() callback. The .unprepare() ops are > + * invoked by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped. > + * > + * Return on first error seen as whatever causes the first error > + * may cause subsequent iterations to fail with a different error. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + int ret, i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) { > + if (!z_rproc->srams[i].id) > + continue; > + > + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node(z_rproc->srams[i].id); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem; > + > + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr & 0xF0000000) == 0xF0000000 ? > + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC; > + > + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "RPU boot from %s.", > + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM"); > + > + return zynqmp_pm_request_wake(z_rproc->pnode_id, 1, > + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Power down R5 Core. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + > + return zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(z_rproc->pnode_id, > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to map > + * > + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + void *va; > + > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + mem->va = va; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to unmap > + * > + * Unmap memory-region carveout > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + iounmap(mem->va); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * parse_mem_regions > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in > + * memory-region property > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int parse_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device_node *np = z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent->of_node; > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > + struct of_phandle_iterator it; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + struct reserved_mem *rmem; > + int index = 0; > + > + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */ > + of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, DDR_LIST_PROP, NULL, 0); > + while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) { > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node); > + if (!rmem) { > + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire %s\n", DDR_LIST_PROP); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (strstr(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer")) { > + mem = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(dev, index, > + rmem->size, > + rmem->base, > + "vdev0buffer"); > + } else { > + /* > + * The ensuing carveout is either for vring, which has > + * device tree node name of length 15 characters, or > + * firmware mem, where name is not used by remoteproc > + * core later on. So default to vring length of 15. > + * > + * Extra char for null-terminated string. > + * > + * only allocate in negative case as strstr returns > + * pointer + offset to string in positive case. > + */ > + char *name; > + > + name = strstr(it.node->name, "vdev0vring"); > + if (name) { > + /* > + * Expect "rpuXvdev0vringX" as documented > + * in xilinx remoteproc device tree binding > + */ > + if (strlen(it.node->name) < 15) { > + dev_err(dev, "%pOF is less than 15 chars", > + it.node); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + } else { > + name = devm_kzalloc(dev, 16 * sizeof(char), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!name) > + return -ENOMEM; > + strncpy(name, it.node->name, 16); > + } > + > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, > + rmem->size, rmem->base, > + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc, > + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release, > + name); > + } > + > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > + index++; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * tcm_mem_alloc > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of > + * > + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5 > + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank > + * remoteproc carveout. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int tcm_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + void *va; > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > + > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* Update memory entry va */ > + mem->va = va; > + > + /* > + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000, > + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx. > + * > + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give > + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000). > + */ > + mem->da &= 0x000fffff; > + > + /* > + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated. > + * > + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and > + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses > + * (0x0 and 0x20000). > + */ > + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000) > + mem->da -= 0x90000; > + > + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */ > + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) { > + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM bank address: %x\n", mem->da); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * tcm_mem_release > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @mem: mem entry to unmap > + * > + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core. > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int tcm_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > +{ > + iounmap(mem->va); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * parse_tcm_banks > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * > + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance > + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory > + * needed for firmware to be loaded > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int parse_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) { > + if (!z_rproc->srams[i].id) > + continue; > + > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(&rproc->dev, NULL, > + z_rproc->srams[i].addr, > + (size_t)z_rproc->srams[i].size, > + z_rproc->srams[i].addr, > + tcm_mem_alloc, > + tcm_mem_release, "sram"); > + if (!mem) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw > + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance > + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core > + * > + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc > + * > + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = parse_tcm_banks(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = parse_mem_regions(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); > + if (ret == -EINVAL) { > + /* > + * resource table only required for IPC. > + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error; > + * for example, loading r5 hello world application > + * so simply inform user and keep going. > + */ > + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n"); > + ret = 0; > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick - kick a firmware if mbox is provided > + * @rproc: r5 core's corresponding rproc structure > + * @vqid: virtqueue ID > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *mb_msg = NULL; > + unsigned int skb_len; > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + int ret; > + > + /* If vqid is negative, do not pass the vqid to > + * mailbox as vqid is supposed to be 0 or positive. > + * It also gives a way to just kick instead but > + * not use the IPI buffer. > + * > + * For now use negative vqid to assume no message will be > + * passed with IPI buffer, but just raise interrupt. > + * This will be faster as it doesn't need to copy the > + * message to the ZynqMP/Versal IPI message buffer. > + */ > + if (vqid >= 0) { > + skb_len = (unsigned int)(sizeof(vqid) + sizeof(mb_msg)); > + skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!skb) > + return; > + > + mb_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)skb_put(skb, skb_len); > + mb_msg->len = sizeof(vqid); > + memcpy(mb_msg->data, &vqid, sizeof(vqid)); > + > + skb_queue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs, skb); > + } > + > + ret = mbox_send_message(z_rproc->tx_chan, mb_msg); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to kick remote.\n"); > + if (mb_msg) { > + skb_dequeue_tail(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + kfree_skb(skb); > + } > + } > +} > + > +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = { > + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start, > + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop, > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments, > + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw, > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check, > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > + .kick = zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick, > + .prepare = r5_rproc_prepare, > + .unprepare = r5_rproc_unprepare, > +}; > + > +/** > + * event_notified_idr_cb - event notified idr callback > + * @id: idr id > + * @ptr: pointer to idr private data > + * @data: data passed to idr_for_each callback > + * > + * Pass notification to remoteproc virtio > + * > + * Return: 0. having return is to satisfy the idr_for_each() function > + * pointer input argument requirement. > + **/ > +static int event_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data) > +{ > + struct rproc *rproc = data; > + > + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id) == IRQ_NONE) > + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "no message was found in idr with id: %d\n", id); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/** > + * handle_event_notified - remoteproc notification work function > + * @work: pointer to the work structure > + * > + * It checks each registered remoteproc notify IDs. > + */ > +static void handle_event_notified(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + > + z_rproc = container_of(work, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, mbox_work); > + rproc = z_rproc->rproc; > + > + /* > + * This is to simply raise interrupt as ACK for remote. > + * > + * Xilinx mailbox, ATF and SoC specific IPI mapping will handle > + * mapping to remote processor. > + */ > + if (mbox_send_message(z_rproc->rx_chan, NULL) < 0) > + dev_warn(rproc->dev.parent, "Failed to kick remote.\n"); > + > + /* > + * We only use IPI for interrupt. The firmware side may or may > + * not write the notifyid when it trigger IPI. > + * And thus, we scan through all the registered notifyids. > + */ > + idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, event_notified_idr_cb, rproc); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb - Receive channel mailbox callback > + * @cl: mailbox client > + * @msg: message pointer > + * > + * It will schedule the R5 notification work. > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, rx_mc); > + /* > + * Notification can be received with message payload. > + * To handle this, check for message contents. > + * If there are contents, copy to ipi message buffer payload location. > + * > + * If message is empty, then that means that was simple raising > + * of interrupt. no payload to process. > + * > + * Note: enqueue work regardless of msg as kick may imply that remote > + * is waiting for ack. > + */ > + if (msg) { > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *ipi_msg, *buf_msg; > + size_t len; > + > + ipi_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)msg; > + buf_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)z_rproc->rx_mc_buf; > + len = (ipi_msg->len >= IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX) ? > + IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX : ipi_msg->len; > + buf_msg->len = len; > + memcpy(buf_msg->data, ipi_msg->data, len); > + } > + schedule_work(&z_rproc->mbox_work); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done - Request has been sent to the remote > + * @cl: mailbox client > + * @msg: pointer to the message which has been sent > + * @r: status of last TX - OK or error > + * > + * It will be called by the mailbox framework when the last TX has done. > + */ > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *msg, int r) > +{ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + > + if (!msg) > + return; > + z_rproc = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, tx_mc); > + skb = skb_dequeue(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + kfree_skb(skb); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox - Setup mailboxes > + * this is used for each individual R5 core > + * > + * @z_rproc: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data > + * @node: pointer of the device node > + * > + * Function to setup mailboxes to talk to RPU. > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc, > + struct device_node *node) > +{ > + struct mbox_client *mclient; > + > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */ > + mclient = &z_rproc->tx_mc; > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent; > + mclient->tx_done = zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done; > + mclient->tx_block = false; > + mclient->knows_txdone = false; > + mclient->rx_callback = NULL; > + > + /* Setup RX mailbox channel client */ > + mclient = &z_rproc->rx_mc; > + mclient->dev = z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent; > + mclient->tx_done = NULL; > + mclient->tx_block = false; > + mclient->knows_txdone = false; > + mclient->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb; > + > + INIT_WORK(&z_rproc->mbox_work, handle_event_notified); > + > + /* Request TX and RX channels */ > + z_rproc->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc->tx_mc, "tx"); > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->tx_chan)) { > + dev_err(z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent, > + "failed to request mbox tx channel.\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(z_rproc->tx_chan); > + } > + > + z_rproc->rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&z_rproc->rx_mc, "rx"); > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc->rx_chan)) { > + dev_err(z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent, > + "failed to request mbox rx channel.\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(z_rproc->rx_chan); > + } > + skb_queue_head_init(&z_rproc->tx_mc_skbs); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc) > +{ > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->tx_chan); > + mbox_free_channel(z_rproc->rx_chan); > +} > + > +/** > + * zynqmp_r5_probe - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node > + * this is called for each individual R5 core to > + * set up mailbox, Xilinx platform manager unique ID, > + * add to rproc core The above has changed since last time, which makes it harder for me to review your work. From hereon please change only the things I point out so that we keep the same goal posts from one revision to the other. The tabulation needs to be fixed: * zynqmp_r5_probe - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node * * This is called for each individual R5 core to set up mailbox, Xilinx * platform manager unique ID, add to rproc core. The description is also broken. > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for current R5 core > + * @node: pointer of the device node for current R5 core > + * @rpu_mode: mode to configure RPU, split or lockstep > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *zynqmp_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > + struct device_node *node, > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode) > +{ > + int ret, num_banks; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct rproc *rproc_ptr; > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct device_node *r5_node; > + > + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */ > + rproc_ptr = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops, > + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_rproc)); > + if (!rproc_ptr) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto error; > + } > + > + rproc_ptr->auto_boot = false; > + z_rproc = rproc_ptr->priv; > + z_rproc->rproc = rproc_ptr; > + r5_node = z_rproc->rproc->dev.parent->of_node; > + > + /* Set up DMA mask */ > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + /* Get R5 power domain node */ > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "power-domain", &z_rproc->pnode_id); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + ret = r5_set_mode(z_rproc, rpu_mode); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "mboxes")) { > + ret = zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(z_rproc, node); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + } > + > + /* go through TCM banks for r5 node */ > + num_banks = of_count_phandle_with_args(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, NULL); Shouldn't this be @node instead of @r5_node? > + if (num_banks <= 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n"); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto error; > + } > + > + if (num_banks > NUM_SRAMS) { > + dev_err(dev, "max number of srams is %d. given: %d \r\n", > + NUM_SRAMS, num_banks); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto error; > + } > + > + /* construct collection of srams used by the current R5 core */ > + for (; num_banks; num_banks--) { > + struct resource rsc; > + struct device_node *dt_node; > + resource_size_t size; > + int i; > + > + dt_node = of_parse_phandle(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, i); > + if (!dt_node) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto error; > + } > + > + ret = of_address_to_resource(dt_node, 0, &rsc); > + if (ret < 0) { > + of_node_put(dt_node); > + goto error; > + } > + > + of_node_put(dt_node); > + size = resource_size(&rsc); > + > + /* > + * Find corresponding Xilinx platform management ID. > + * The bank information is used in prepare/unprepare and > + * parse_fw. > + */ > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_SRAMS; i++) { > + if (rsc.start == zynqmp_banks[i].addr) { > + z_rproc->srams[i].addr = rsc.start; > + z_rproc->srams[i].size = size; > + z_rproc->srams[i].id = zynqmp_banks[i].id; > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (i == NUM_SRAMS) { > + dev_err(dev, "sram %llx is not valid.\n", rsc.start); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto error; > + } > + } Everything that is related to the initialisation of srams above should be in a function on its own. This too is new code that wasn't requested - the next revision needs to include *only* the changes I request. Any improvement on the current implementation can be made in future patchsets. > + > + /* Add R5 remoteproc */ > + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, rproc_ptr); > + if (ret) { > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc); > + goto error; > + } > + > + return z_rproc; > +error: > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster > + * > + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT, > + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations > + * > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int ret, core_count; > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > + struct device_node *nc; > + enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP; > + struct list_head *cluster; /* list to track each core's rproc */ > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc; > + struct platform_device *child_pdev; > + struct list_head *pos; > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &rpu_mode); > + if (ret < 0 || (rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && > + rpu_mode != PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT)) { > + dev_err(dev, "invalid cluster mode: ret %d mode %x\n", > + ret, rpu_mode); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU configuration: %s\n", > + rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP ? "lockstep" : "split"); > + > + /* > + * if 2 RPUs provided but one is lockstep, then we have an > + * invalid configuration. > + */ > + > + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node); > + if ((rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && core_count != 1) || > + core_count > MAX_RPROCS) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cluster) > + return -ENOMEM; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(cluster); > + > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "devm_of_platform_populate failed, ret = %d\n", ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + /* probe each individual r5 core's remoteproc-related info */ > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, nc) { > + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(nc); The device reference needs to be dropped after use, as described in the function documentation. I'm out of time - I will continue tomorrow. Mathieu > + if (!child_pdev) { > + dev_err(dev, "could not get R5 core platform device\n"); > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out; > + } > + > + z_rproc = zynqmp_r5_probe(child_pdev, nc, rpu_mode); > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s to probe rpu %pOF\n", > + ret ? "Failed" : "Able", nc); > + if (IS_ERR(z_rproc)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(z_rproc); > + goto out; > + } > + list_add_tail(&z_rproc->elem, cluster); > + } > + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */ > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster); > + return 0; > +out: > + list_for_each(pos, cluster) { > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem); > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc); > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > +/* > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove > + * > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster > + * > + * When the driver is unloaded, clean up the mailboxes for each > + * remoteproc that was initially probed. > + */ > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct list_head *pos, *temp, *cluster = (struct list_head *) > + platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct zynqmp_r5_rproc *z_rproc = NULL; > + > + list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, cluster) { > + z_rproc = list_entry(pos, struct zynqmp_r5_rproc, elem); > + zynqmp_r5_cleanup_mbox(z_rproc); > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */ > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc", }, > + { /* end of list */ }, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = { > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe, > + .remove = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc", > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Levinsky "); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.17.1 >