Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2051315pxb; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:46:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjEOjGtoOKVyrbm8CYbj48rjNpfL9Em2m/uRn/LVdgWDEBiSvKOxcVnJRV8V3f/e2vp92l X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17d5:: with SMTP id s21mr423615edy.65.1615236411143; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:46:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615236411; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gDMi02SWffHNz7cKE6DDAWGHgHh0/86DFGggJJSYwjFOzlofQ/Oe5U6nX080rDqcEg dGk57T8dKXcT3wlPvni9fGKgWOcxg4xcrYyAX2V05be1FEdfRvE3+TViEItygpbrWyHG On5U2WOsgJC8n19krOZh5i5iR235IS1CNL1nfEwyMwuI26m7Z/fkw3wyQXzwYV4o9VMv 6g41KzaZLjgU9ga77mA2sOW4fHaYhR/SZukRj7leNlYZf2KRsqyMBgKB9HYxlCZj9cf4 ygP0jD5Bb+aD5r1XEIwlHxK0wR74xobYemXwNFcrP9geDl7zxBkLtzlNNpKpCl44+Cmf EpGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=0dSgvldILtxO+iATwL16XT0ow/QSZXvYwHQdWeYe5gY=; b=D7bp8TD/PiiFtlkzZFxrQW4vS9AnHC3BAIYN9g+uY+wzsPqbXHBdXtEcZfVUjMID6p kDvBcr5elG7+gLLo+iIEUx4cMC8hH0TeP5z5bC2USTTc0Jb0zmQWA8wkQPdVAAkjTL0J ErhT6EYjSniNdLV9Sc4Bdcp8VEhMEVXgxOBGNkR6LwV4ulCJqcBcLmEgcEIrHDFwNOD2 OvWyV6xKfgLA/KXtFgEgOY5rsC74fsy30xk5htrLvWLC1hYEjNI8KF7fICOIWA7K22jW VNDmE/Q+WRnccQpdVULArpVfwlY4ZU0RKF+B4dX2h0NeAu3sBzYNvhlonfaq9qr+hZ1c 2kYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=1yponGFO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a21si7741732edn.317.2021.03.08.12.46.28; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 12:46:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=korg header.b=1yponGFO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229756AbhCHUmy (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:42:54 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34400 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231252AbhCHUm2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:42:28 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B45F64F09; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:42:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1615236148; bh=Q+729RpzRWiSDmoA11m7P/RlPUtuXJidEKu+QeR4f/0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1yponGFO48b8sMeILoThXvXh9tf+Ef1H/UzKG0/b/7o2Tw5lIezwZ2bJ2+wEX3UmW vWfMeRlABfpwkoSlKzsWMqpPj/dFDXrIv2GV+x7cF1oHNKP+peFF1aLwYYyLFGi/Uj Z1hV9D/lK3y7sTFlvnWV6ocaAoI4OZqCDyjut2S8= Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:42:27 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Michal Hocko Cc: Zhou Guanghui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, npiggin@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, guohanjun@huawei.com, dingtianhong@huawei.com, chenweilong@huawei.com, rui.xiang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/memcg: set memcg when split page Message-Id: <20210308124227.f9b343f006d26ba8d47a959c@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20210304074053.65527-1-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> <20210304074053.65527-3-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com> <20210305155840.4bb6dea4fb473d9ffbe49c99@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:41:38 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 05-03-21 15:58:40, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:52:52 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Thu 04-03-21 07:40:53, Zhou Guanghui wrote: > > > > As described in the split_page function comment, for the non-compound > > > > high order page, the sub-pages must be freed individually. If the > > > > memcg of the fisrt page is valid, the tail pages cannot be uncharged > > > > when be freed. > > > > > > > > For example, when alloc_pages_exact is used to allocate 1MB continuous > > > > physical memory, 2MB is charged(kmemcg is enabled and __GFP_ACCOUNT is > > > > set). When make_alloc_exact free the unused 1MB and free_pages_exact > > > > free the applied 1MB, actually, only 4KB(one page) is uncharged. > > > > > > > > Therefore, the memcg of the tail page needs to be set when split page. > > > > > > > > > > As already mentioned there are at least two explicit users of > > > __GFP_ACCOUNT with alloc_exact_pages added recently. It would be good to > > > mention that explicitly and maybe even mention 7efe8ef274024 resp. > > > c419621873713 so that it is clear this is not just a theoretical issue. > > > > I added > > > > : Michel: > > : > > : There are at least two explicit users of __GFP_ACCOUNT with > > : alloc_exact_pages added recently. See 7efe8ef274024 ("KVM: arm64: > > : Allocate stage-2 pgd pages with GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT") and c419621873713 > > : ("KVM: s390: Add memcg accounting to KVM allocations"), so this is not > > : just a theoretical issue. > > > > And should we cc:stable on this one? > > Somebody more familiar with iommu dma allocation layer should have a > look as well (__iommu_dma_alloc_pages) so that we know whether there are > kernels outside of the above two ones mentioned above that need a fix. > But in general this sounds like a good fit for the stable tree. OK. I reversed the order of these two patches so we don't need to burden -stable with a cosmetic rename.