Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210127225641.1342-1-mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>
 <20210127225641.1342-2-mike.ximing.chen@intel.com> <YCKP5ZUL1/wMzmf4@kroah.com>
 <CAPcyv4hC2dJGAXbG2ogO=2THuDUHjgYekkNy4K_zwEmQcXLcjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BYAPR11MB3095C54BA878D8A5502CA891D9939@BYAPR11MB3095.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <YEaFbyUM0Fu763vm@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YEaFbyUM0Fu763vm@kroah.com>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:05:35 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iXfBY7rrSLJrFV4KjJsM+_Z_KAeLK5bg73nT7PYqWHcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/20] dlb: add skeleton for DLB driver
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Chen, Mike Ximing" <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        "kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
        Kevin Laatz <kevin.laatz@intel.com>, maximmi@mellanox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

[ add Kevin and Maxim ]

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:13 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:00:00PM +0000, Chen, Mike Ximing wrote:
[..]
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > While waiting for the feedback from the networking maintainers, I am
> > wondering if you have any other comments/suggestions that I  should address
> > in parallel.
>
> It's in my "to-review" queue, which is huge at the moment.  But the
> networking developers review will determine how this should go forward,
> so I'll just wait for them to get to it.


Mike,

Perhaps it would help to solicit feedback from other networking
developers that have delivered kernel features to be consumed by DPDK.
A coarse look potentially flagsKevin and Maxim working on AF_XDP
updates that DPDK consumes, Perhaps they would be willing to take a
look?