Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selinux: measure state and policy capabilities
To:     Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
        zohar@linux.ibm.com,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
        tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com,
        casey@schaufler-ca.com, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
        gmazyland@gmail.com, sashal@kernel.org,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210212163709.3139-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
 <CAHC9VhSMz8FtK5HMPA1+FMeU0cs4vfCCaimxb-J+VDj_Dyk-nA@mail.gmail.com>
 <af0f2d60c6584b613172b08e4fcea4119e231e93.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <CAHC9VhRBdJ9Vh1ESezim129OEf1UJ-Mxm1g9FpxEJmt-PUSLjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9170636f-1793-2272-e3fe-1551c18edeb9@linux.microsoft.com>
 <CAHC9VhQEAPB_kQFxBrJWtsL8wP9YoQkCzXnXmaD5gm9duBzYcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <af3b4070-7474-984b-72a1-be7db736cc47@linux.microsoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:43:50 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhQEAPB_kQFxBrJWtsL8wP9YoQkCzXnXmaD5gm9duBzYcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 3/8/21 4:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
> <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> On 3/5/21 11:22 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 12:57 PM James Bottomley
>>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 12:52 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> This draft seems fine to me, but there is a small logistical blocker
>>>>> at the moment which means I can't merge this until -rc2 is released,
>>>>> which likely means this coming Monday.  The problem is that this
>>>>> patch relies on code that went upstream via in the last merge window
>>>>> via the IMA tree, not the SELinux tree; normally that wouldn't be a
>>>>> problem as I typically rebase the selinux/next to Linus' -rc1 tag
>>>>> once the merge window is closed, but in this particular case the -rc1
>>>>> tag is dangerously broken for some system configurations (the tag has
>>>>> since been renamed) so I'm not rebasing onto -rc1 this time around.
>>>>>
>>>>> Assuming that -rc2 fixes the swapfile/fs-corruption problem, early
>>>>> next week I'll rebase selinux/next to -rc2 and merge this patch.
>>>>> However, if the swapfile bug continues past -rc2 we can consider
>>>>> merging this via the IMA tree, but I'd assume not do that if possible
>>>>> due to merge conflict and testing reasons.
>>>>
>>>> If it helps, we rebased the SCSI tree on top of the merge for the
>>>> swapfile fix which is this one, without waiting for -rc2:
>>>
>>> Considering that -rc2 is only two days away I'm not going to lose a
>>> lot of sleep over it.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>>
>> I can wait until the swapfile issue is resolved (in rc2 or later) and
>> you are able to merge this patch. Please take your time.
> 
> Thanks for your patience Lakshmi, I just merged this into my local
> selinux/next branch and will be pushing it up to kernel.org later
> tonight - thank you!
> 

Thanks Paul.

  -lakshmi