Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2324362pxb; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:34:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSns2Nqvcqd/hUqtENwyDhbEjKzzHK+bdgfxphKvAq2nZTItBncPlrHuZpiPcgPORJ127n X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c857:: with SMTP id g23mr2409197edt.86.1615271699746; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:34:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615271699; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=encHxfTBGjSQN2s7OtqAdEkSDiYYQ/TyOUm2p4CrxEkMLt0/DWaf1phyHToqhsx1yY ZGtrECRL1vcg2x+jtzCbca23MHwLq97XF37DB9v3vrVuT1Dtlc6yX6a4zUzRu2UvJBM/ B4CWVcQTKnzt2M3F9kbWYFpeEWZ4U3ftLw7GBS4uyz9U+GnKwVyvY3068HJDgoYV1FGD xJrwIhN46f600+wuLD9Uk3xzrjc1T75vqyA2YoFbRjVz5hx2t+5ffYSetrFPJCKnPWMM dWKXLOHsb7X28Of5CYWgIZZQPIQ8ougi9ug4LQzokPQ264wLE8DLztD/An4+q8qcuO6s Lf4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dmarc-filter:sender:dkim-signature; bh=afPnO9CK9L08xTR5B8jAfqmQQdcIctt7DT1nHJBd/7U=; b=IadgBE7DnYf6lpdk1Iedh9CEhRzf27tTnYPrTNcj+Wkiq78kQvAP0US/R9DtCopbuv pTFtSPDihPkx5kWcZEJYt5vPDFP6vcVhIi/pr6hD8RRRJm65vWxrKvVV1Lwy8METq65M ORDOXB/wj6wmgFMH1VJP640lJ+/JY8Saa/H73fkWjQR9ondq+DEEsodssIfTHTAMr1S2 hyQL1xAT8cdgwgVLYHFdWuHJhDX/GWwIc5+0xBomG3Hl5ZwvjEtx8XYgEBCUvrXhZ726 L3v+iXUEUjv/gnoKfg5cNIFznFJfmSK89Kb+ppd/og/crgrgwhJR42F5vwY1Sz4ud8zh C1cg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=I3JtECr6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v10si5920242eds.85.2021.03.08.22.34.37; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 22:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b=I3JtECr6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229813AbhCIGd1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:33:27 -0500 Received: from z11.mailgun.us ([104.130.96.11]:58329 "EHLO z11.mailgun.us" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229607AbhCIGdV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:33:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1615271601; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=afPnO9CK9L08xTR5B8jAfqmQQdcIctt7DT1nHJBd/7U=; b=I3JtECr6S6Qag6ZKTA3aueaa6m7cMWGotY1vhjjRpyeqVzfl+wEjCN8VGlmmlKjyD5LU9pUO uHGGYAFQc6T5X6uGDq9lIatQOrG9LP7Q07O4N9aiXvWAsmfdsV+d5x3b/OpESLrroHsClso+ LUdLq8Q62D4uCKJkCA7Neo6p2xE= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.96.11 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 604716b0c862e1b9fdef180e (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 06:33:20 GMT Sender: wcheng=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 74FCDC433ED; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:33:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from [10.110.90.255] (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: wcheng) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97E0BC433CA; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 06:33:17 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 97E0BC433CA Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=wcheng@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: dwc3: Trigger a GCTL soft reset when switching modes in DRD To: Thinh Nguyen , John Stultz , Felipe Balbi Cc: lkml , Yu Chen , Tejas Joglekar , Yang Fei , YongQin Liu , Andrzej Pietrasiewicz , Jun Li , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux USB List , Heikki Krogerus , Roger Quadros References: <20210108015115.27920-1-john.stultz@linaro.org> <87bldzwr6x.fsf@kernel.org> <06a44245-4f2f-69ba-fe46-b88a19f585c2@codeaurora.org> <3db531c4-7058-68ec-8d4b-ff122c307697@synopsys.com> From: Wesley Cheng Message-ID: <8b5f7348-66d7-4902-eac8-593ab503db96@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:33:16 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3db531c4-7058-68ec-8d4b-ff122c307697@synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/8/2021 7:05 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote: > Wesley Cheng wrote: >> >> On 3/6/2021 3:41 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote: >>> Wesley Cheng wrote: >>>> On 1/8/2021 4:44 PM, Thinh Nguyen wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> John Stultz wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:26 AM Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John Stultz writes: >>>>>>>> From: Yu Chen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just resending this, as discussion died out a bit and I'm not >>>>>>>> sure how to make further progress. See here for debug data that >>>>>>>> was requested last time around: >>>>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALAqxLXdnaUfJKx0aN9xWwtfWVjMWigPpy2aqsNj56yvnbU80g@mail.gmail.com/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnsnlqd3w$ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With the current dwc3 code on the HiKey960 we often see the >>>>>>>> COREIDLE flag get stuck off in __dwc3_gadget_start(), which >>>>>>>> seems to prevent the reset irq and causes the USB gadget to >>>>>>>> fail to initialize. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We had seen occasional initialization failures with older >>>>>>>> kernels but with recent 5.x era kernels it seemed to be becoming >>>>>>>> much more common, so I dug back through some older trees and >>>>>>>> realized I dropped this quirk from Yu Chen during upstreaming >>>>>>>> as I couldn't provide a proper rational for it and it didn't >>>>>>>> seem to be necessary. I now realize I was wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After resubmitting the quirk, Thinh Nguyen pointed out that it >>>>>>>> shouldn't be a quirk at all and it is actually mentioned in the >>>>>>>> programming guide that it should be done when switching modes >>>>>>>> in DRD. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, to avoid these !COREIDLE lockups seen on HiKey960, this >>>>>>>> patch issues GCTL soft reset when switching modes if the >>>>>>>> controller is in DRD mode. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi >>>>>>>> Cc: Tejas Joglekar >>>>>>>> Cc: Yang Fei >>>>>>>> Cc: YongQin Liu >>>>>>>> Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz >>>>>>>> Cc: Thinh Nguyen >>>>>>>> Cc: Jun Li >>>>>>>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>>>>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >>>>>>>> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Chen >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> v2: >>>>>>>> * Rework to always call the GCTL soft reset in DRD mode, >>>>>>>> rather then using a quirk as suggested by Thinh Nguyen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v3: >>>>>>>> * Move GCTL soft reset under the spinlock as suggested by >>>>>>>> Thinh Nguyen >>>>>>> Because this is such an invasive change, I would prefer that we get >>>>>>> Tested-By tags from a good fraction of the users before applying these >>>>>>> two changes. >>>>>> I'm happy to reach out to folks to try to get that. Though I'm >>>>>> wondering if it would be better to put it behind a dts quirk flag, as >>>>>> originally proposed? >>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201021181803.79650-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/__;!!A4F2R9G_pg!LNzuprAeg-O80SgolYkIkW4-ne-M-yLWCDUY9MygAIrQC398Z6gRJ9wnRWITZfc$ >>>>>> >>>>>> That way folks can enable it for devices as they need? >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, I'm not trying to force this in as-is, just mostly sending it >>>>>> out again for discussion to understand what other approach might work. >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> -john >>>>> A quirk would imply something is broken/diverged from the design right? >>>>> But it's not the case here, and at least this is needed for HiKey960. >>>>> Also, I think Rob will be ok with not adding 1 more quirk to the dwc3 >>>>> devicetree. :) >>>>> >>>>> BR, >>>>> Thinh >>>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Sorry for jumping in, but I checked the SNPS v1.90a databook, and that >>>> seemed to remove the requirement for the GCTL.softreset before writing >>>> to PRTCAPDIR. Should we consider adding a controller version/IP check? >>>> >>> Hi Wesley, >>> >>> From what I see in the v1.90a databook and others, the flow remains the >>> same. I need to check internally, but I'm not aware of the change. >>> >> Hi Thinh, >> >> Hmmm, can you help check the register description for the PRTCAPDIR on >> your v1.90a databook? (Table 1-19 Fields for Register: GCTL (Continued) >> Pg73) When we compared the sequence in the description there to the >> previous versions it removed the GCTL.softreset. If it still shows up >> on yours, then maybe my v1.90a isn't the final version? >> >> Thanks >> Wesley Cheng >> > > Hi Wesley, > > Actually your IP version type may use the newer flow. Can you print your > DWC3_VER_TYPE? I still need to verify internally to know which versions > need the update if any. > > Thanks, > Thinh > Hi Thinh, Sure, my DWC3_VER_TYPE output = 0x67612A2A Thanks Wesley Cheng -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project