Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210304201253.14652-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0gR=gN2ROo9JSOGHokw5imscMBwDERni8X83p0eWt634w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJUQ3r0YCeQvPq=SW57w-5BLtoTO1_bv=2uw6CX_1-EXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJZ5v0h7zUMU9DMofa3fhop9fYY6UJQ6Nm3xBOmG48bcmLCj3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMpxmJXa2Qxznss3c79Zf-PzsX=SY6WOJorAMvS-UxKoViKP_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <YEZ81OraApPIu8d9@smile.fi.intel.com> <YEaAY37PsqT6WQB9@smile.fi.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <YEaAY37PsqT6WQB9@smile.fi.intel.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:19:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJUQ+Fhz8XTh14eHiqdQc3jBEwr8wuezw+NcgtU8XXFUQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] gpiolib: switch to fwnode in the core
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:29:27PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:26 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > > > <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > My impression was that Andy wanted me to take them.
> > > >
> > > > However, if you'd rather take care of them yourself, there you go!
> > > >
> > > > I'll drop them now and assume that they will be routed through the GPIO tree.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > They touch a lot of core GPIO code and are likely to conflict if any
> > > other changes show up this release cycle. I'd rather take them through
> > > the usual channel. Thanks!
> >
> > Since now we have v4 based on Rafael's bleeding-edge, what do you want me to
> > do? Resend a v5 with all patches included?
>
> I have decided to resend as usually it's better for maintainers.
>
> But it appears I was too quick to miss Rafael's review tag / comments.
>
> So, I will send v6 with those included.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>

Does this series depend on patches already in Rafael's tree? If so,
maybe Rafael can provide me with an immutable tag to merge in?

Bartosz