Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2390388pxb; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 00:59:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr0gjVuwaSJxaD13bELI3CDJONX4rGvxlOInHKYsk8OvyMH+2K3VKVD5YwrXmTAY4CPiyB X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b4c:: with SMTP id v12mr19457305ejg.330.1615280366501; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:59:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615280366; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rQAHov8ggJyhwgvdbXEv8GaL9ujwHnuUEpCRzjv1leH2kd8P3wOxcokbd3QJUL0H28 UksBpeKJWgWCZG5HLGJ+akR/Pn47jalN6dvFgxK/LUfhSwqMDF8sbHI+vuEz9wPBeAZ4 rc+uj/YHMQZsbAnsfObqhcOIaP/Ovy308WfsHy/mXttlqHvDmEhlLsto4Zp/uunZW0A4 9oG1Hz6EHJanZhlRXm/lDy1/2b9BTrwyYDrXw0gTRnzmC489ipS4FIpOZn1ZXc5+97vA Z/xqyDjO+Og8+1UTY6Alk/WgRP10azaSmqMuO7IFnWhO3gDR68r9iLmVn7TdPzlFX5xy 8P8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=B5ih2s0wGc6zEFGLbxaitiDeyP8RPIDxWcG4Pgj6aB8=; b=V6IbC1/FBkvEGX3bQHTB24eb8LSHZ6deTcodEVF8Muo9GxJui8oRf6rM42hP4z+LpP mLT6TEpLLmTYr7zzOi/BCpHEf6nl8zUSfe4aR5LKsW/glR1Ioxs4TuH2dff5laa1+vt+ chsjO3Dm61/4MdklkxK0nSiWTZVVRWxKSsB369d9Y8WlwSweQCc1jwhaGhauaWUpV6+d Itir3L6D4Vw6TjyVopur0WMk6dgM0ULJDD4dWngFpXaVsxDFma/Mp63HoslSIkT9RFJd LrUZ154zPg75oWwrBkU1IL4Mp8QFMj998kdoqhggq1fpx9NXV9U+DQ2X2DZPEgjEVkW/ x9bQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=skIi6WtK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si8934752ejy.298.2021.03.09.00.59.03; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=skIi6WtK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229904AbhCIIzw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:55:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229850AbhCIIzn (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:55:43 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42b.google.com (mail-pf1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC30C06174A; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 00:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id 16so7515853pfn.5; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:55:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=B5ih2s0wGc6zEFGLbxaitiDeyP8RPIDxWcG4Pgj6aB8=; b=skIi6WtK6erYgcTFqAwcc4M5eJz175vB27CUN/27YkRO+dfOhWaYavQbh3YRsCJvxQ H8V60Cqx1GIFDazpK5UDJUbLlDQS+5nvVb4Wkn8yyOstL5uP7Gtkmm3Sb+bccTtDJbXU GZWUcydG+y6fQdpiYT/6fjbjkgjMC1o/p4BsXQq4Ka/B45g8y8t9uruFQgot5v/6vAHL qDA8oDvupxDCrhVjfefEwbMk5C61cW6OkBFuKJpNbVJGoClU91RLL/MUClC0BnWvb45j g7CBwhZPLSDFkUYicRdaYeu+qmsRbFkanzkliQDnIUxM6fej2uong4IjbKg8IkmNLG3w dqmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=B5ih2s0wGc6zEFGLbxaitiDeyP8RPIDxWcG4Pgj6aB8=; b=JUCM7LksH0bpIDY5he/OunPcJmhpLnqBCM8L07KZctsfv31h/W7LhpqeHsibO7IomI VwroaJ5HfwmnrgnxnVGhYUMo3OEhihE5XhX3hIuIy0ATyt2v3VnTfWiG/gqNx/JkY2dF 2eP6kHSdqjOMYueQwQtve6lupnN82i+EwWt765v1GOHQ6zgOQ6mJDxwbhDiXIRnp5351 AzwUZUBMkFuBA5+Wi1kDLCG6C4aTDys9veu2zXidRqjHiE34N5ivcA9QSBEskvK4vIrL Kf0YGteY3Ldorx2IjjT0RtJBTm/oHQMdaN/M7gLleMSP3SXUrQpMdr3Q0Byf2sfb54Xz lkPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MKz0U9SJOiT0lB/L2syGDfshsg9tdcei+szMuG96UuS2ZugbX Z/tADrt8eB/XswXK80zWRWHldTxqhnv6I5AI X-Received: by 2002:a63:a22:: with SMTP id 34mr23965822pgk.328.1615280142844; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:55:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.160.0.86] ([45.135.186.124]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q34sm12073556pgl.92.2021.03.09.00.55.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:55:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: netlink: fix error return code of netlink_proto_init() To: Heiner Kallweit , davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, mkubecek@suse.cz, jbi.octave@gmail.com, yangyingliang@huawei.com, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, rdunlap@infradead.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org References: <20210309083356.24083-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> <1ca491b5-1c65-6dee-1f8c-d86006714b51@gmail.com> From: Jia-Ju Bai Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:55:34 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1ca491b5-1c65-6dee-1f8c-d86006714b51@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/3/9 16:47, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 09.03.2021 09:33, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: >> When kcalloc() returns NULL to nl_table, no error return code of >> netlink_proto_init() is assigned. >> To fix this bug, err is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case. >> > Didn't we talk enough about your incorrect patches yesterday? > This one is incorrect again. panic() never returns. > Stop sending patches until you understand the code you're changing! Ah, sorry, I was too confident about this bug report... Thanks for your reply. Following your advice, now I am sending the patches only for the bug reports that I am confident about after careful code review. Some of the patches have been applied, but some of them are still wrong, like this patch... I am sorry for the false positives... Best wishes, Jia-Ju Bai