Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2641714pxb; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 07:29:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMvgKQiPNYSnpzrH2a3atzTpBB8DPE4IKWwkUT/kH9JxQ4cAwnWSzD7+pH62e3e0ykGJ8R X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d8c6:: with SMTP id re6mr20080104ejb.311.1615303789102; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:29:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615303789; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j4gt5nHd6gEnjVBSySiorD4YYYhr8UA+zI87MZs+VpAFWzm0fzoATXMSnNG5lAwC7h 11KLa2D+bjaJCdiQI9dHvWo03EIbN2/JwqzmQEA4SHR1zVs/WO+5NBwZqjGB0FCo+556 SHvRYtGbOYgqimrjtGsLf1RB43I4i68X1zkcmRH2AlPVhVL7yPBn2sP/52JLXrA4NKNo +O7k6ql6Fk5JYK3snrppsWrHIYHW8iG5a0i7zgyLTVIG7LNy4/P2WCZ5Y+lU2j7qD2HB 0UN81UaJSk/6ep2CTtX2KzQAtx+bzZ+joisWwOYhvbqTwnciEiTM+GosSbwGTTIHa6oZ i4Qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=i7Je4s9jLjkU6AVLpIyNjCtg3fyjSocWOMAMvv7ImMM=; b=MInIhRrmoW+T4zHHc7RxV6nqgybM+MLaFR6cX9IbmMzeO2WAmgOxAhUwqPp4cum08W /dJzsaXkeeVAfs2U1lXpv0MVoZIh20Dhlj6uSMMLPD3XTlWWIaIe1G2iTw5W8s4B3ycP 4/UiGbpn2WCmIVQdbdtoJQwiukG1dEyFV5zmzg+tqPLxNoeTxgaC4wsuna/y/5Yr6lyZ ObD4dbhlh4/i8Pxy5SDDcCcdDXii91OZ/Ot+2A7eHIn/8cl1uPbpEOfYXTTsTZiR/0Xe u/jfo7skhQTSC3r1ac9A0cwfTGIGYG1eND38+lpThMNIg5MO5NN9142sVFSKlVQPHwKO 0W8A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j21si9284677edh.58.2021.03.09.07.29.25; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232054AbhCIPZ3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:25:29 -0500 Received: from out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.133]:56619 "EHLO out30-133.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231966AbhCIPZV (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:25:21 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R471e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01424;MF=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=14;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UR8pmsK_1615303512; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xlpang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UR8pmsK_1615303512) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 23:25:13 +0800 From: Xunlei Pang To: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Konstantin Khlebnikov , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , Shu Ming , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wen Yang , James Wang , Xunlei Pang Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/slub: Fix count_partial() problem Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:25:08 +0800 Message-Id: <1615303512-35058-1-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org count_partial() can hold n->list_lock spinlock for quite long, which makes much trouble to the system. This series eliminate this problem. v1->v2: - Improved changelog and variable naming for PATCH 1~2. - PATCH3 adds per-cpu counter to avoid performance regression in concurrent __slab_free(). v2->v3: - Changed "page->inuse" to the safe "new.inuse", etc. - Used CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG and CONFIG_SYSFS condition for new counters. - atomic_long_t -> unsigned long [Testing] There seems might be a little performance impact under extreme __slab_free() concurrent calls according to my tests. On my 32-cpu 2-socket physical machine: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1) perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- hackbench 20 thread 20000 == original, no patched Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.536050899 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.24% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.588049142 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.35% ) == patched with patch1~4 Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.670892273 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.29% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.746755689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.21% ) 2) perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- hackbench 32 thread 20000 == original, no patched Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.784911855 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.14% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.868687608 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.19% ) == patched with patch1~4 Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.681273015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.21% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.681238459 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.09% ) Xunlei Pang (4): mm/slub: Introduce two counters for partial objects mm/slub: Get rid of count_partial() percpu: Export per_cpu_sum() mm/slub: Use percpu partial free counter include/linux/percpu-defs.h | 10 ++++ kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 10 ---- mm/slab.h | 4 ++ mm/slub.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1