Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] PM / devfreq: bail out early if no freq changes in
 devfreq_set_target
To:     Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     dongas86@gmail.com, kernel@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
        linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
        cw00.choi@samsung.com, abel.vesa@nxp.com
References: <1615294733-22761-1-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
 <1615294733-22761-5-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b6de03c9-8744-90b2-11fe-914ef016fa1f@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:47:39 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1615294733-22761-5-git-send-email-aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 21. 3. 9. 오후 9:58, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> It's unnecessary to set the same freq again and run notifier calls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> ---
>   drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> index bf3047896e41..6e80bf70e7b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
> @@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long new_freq,
>   	else
>   		cur_freq = devfreq->previous_freq;
>   
> +	if (new_freq == cur_freq)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	freqs.old = cur_freq;
>   	freqs.new = new_freq;
>   	devfreq_notify_transition(devfreq, &freqs, DEVFREQ_PRECHANGE);
> @@ -374,7 +377,7 @@ static int devfreq_set_target(struct devfreq *devfreq, unsigned long new_freq,
>   	 * and DEVFREQ_POSTCHANGE because for showing the correct frequency
>   	 * change order of between devfreq device and passive devfreq device.
>   	 */
> -	if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled() && new_freq != cur_freq)
> +	if (trace_devfreq_frequency_enabled())
>   		trace_devfreq_frequency(devfreq, new_freq, cur_freq);
>   
>   	freqs.new = new_freq;
> 

I'd like you to squash patch4 with patch6 because actually patch6
is too minor clean-up. I think it is possible.

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi