Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp156583pxb; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:24:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4QdgHTHz9bIwFKEb2y7HOiPzrp+3tJzgcyBlN+BIJON/+TBlT2NBd5o57JW5Urk5D0qC/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:af91:: with SMTP id mj17mr1254089ejb.230.1615346664479; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:24:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615346664; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MGi+F5OCkYW/Y6ZBC2BA2VwW0ix21YbqGIHLroqzhG4BL4sFFu21glRPyCOW5kfLyb y6LMK8oXX2YoAqCvJx3LstHRpV8G0mn2xx6nR1J8/spOOIDt/6KHxTFN6D3AzWxegRB5 f8JYNwK5DRz9TN+iHo6W0d7u/Kgzdnhgu4puwgfeyC0wxLw6VogJp0LErkpbgdY9tLwY Cazkz90k23pplVfbLOOrnOV87ddbkPTXjhlBokHCIkv3wWjaXoKoSG+aVVlX5fIrCrMN ABKBFb0yTpOn/ARYqjt7WiZy+TZEnzCQ8Da/L5AW6YQNK8Hvpi8T3lOy5tPE6Upo12Q3 UFoQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=J2XwB36eXJKYuuPFa+xQF2Oj55lS2ihjK8QzJTmob/g=; b=Pd0cU4gDrWFJlOgAIos4JjH8+mRXlOsAQ+Q8Bc2pVhhwm1fDzrGAeU3BcFU3YyRtIU PkHIvUaLE/C6tJq++gjqcTimlxW9buJAqxgMJll7g5OL4DZ5W6as7L8XwDe6sEqUcMlH mcysCEDaNIm4Ze7jv2ba3zwUFdcTboRrmx5ZbDh2sQZxQOYJes0UyaH9OFziVj+1mrX2 zTMpUesGHvQ+F05Kul+k7le7xOF4OLnMhlQtRemYz68zxJSBV3ykrtiWfI9CJzHbD9t4 KT6XRvlyNTum81neQ3I60h5tJcNB9o2TfgvqrNPz9W4c2VMN5K2oF731CJySrtieaxVn f/mA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=E31twb0Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g7si10121360edb.286.2021.03.09.19.24.01; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=E31twb0Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231992AbhCJDUn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:20:43 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56176 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231146AbhCJDUe (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:20:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4522FC06174A; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id y13so7633421pfr.0; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:20:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=J2XwB36eXJKYuuPFa+xQF2Oj55lS2ihjK8QzJTmob/g=; b=E31twb0Z4lcvg9i9/gts8lWTTOVTklysLXiv3MiWV0m5jKStkjgKYyLAF+kIU9hVUZ Gj6JzKr1oTd4eBG/PWErAJmHFGHenxFY6bpPMA7YjiL7qBJIiPt4FbXUqmPebDj4MA+8 +DQPTCUywaIzsb5s28o7yObucsZyGNJEgzJrSY98XQOxPZL58MkhsdXoM8SsH5nozVNn Q7DviyBgTweka2XOqImPqy5vj5jU4zHp0K1XRPxq8htFM6WUJVff7uxEQjAQn4dB+0X8 0ce0fmM6wh91FSk8Og6CNCBkFoaR/p3E4aq/qa1YJ+mxZu61/yy7cPMLrlcoJHtL+VVc mZ3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=J2XwB36eXJKYuuPFa+xQF2Oj55lS2ihjK8QzJTmob/g=; b=F4MCIqcIG7KUJyRi5VxIknoVz+gm2PMCNTxMm/oB/HAx4NjOu3mIGwNOw9Kpcf4qGh Hc4is7ClPKrpf7of5P0dKFZRG30RKyszZ9Zz9GFY1Y0i2xIZBBJLvOY7YFqs5VitTNSw tTGRCeSjmPdZOntp7rEy6azRgYXOKk475rycswgCi4/+PeUebgbRYrUwcA1knNdD9XTO /I12IU/chSzKG5fd7XoVJ49qF07vORIXeryy4IXShztBHm69bA/hMmgqAzWcUan82VZt 4Yf204OuN3ujEZ4mjk8qxeBe660mRYLoEFk4N7PkStEmcmF86ZP7dhiWHbRYsr5pnbIu h1Gw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530E6DuUSeA0fhLQENXACc2Ne3xzwNRKfayoeT0+B5E8UPfK7hN2 c2bLuksRT8mAv8ezz0qVV02FABGWug3WQsw3 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8488:0:b029:1fc:f312:b24e with SMTP id u8-20020aa784880000b02901fcf312b24emr840441pfn.55.1615346433876; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.62.0.178] ([45.135.186.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm13998934pfq.109.2021.03.09.19.20.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:20:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: renesas_usbhs: fix error return code of usbhsf_pkt_handler() To: Yoshihiro Shimoda Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" References: <20210307090030.22369-1-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> <255bce3c-1680-593d-9083-6635e1a57b63@gmail.com> From: Jia-Ju Bai Message-ID: <05aecdb3-23f5-54aa-c396-bff7f1624899@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:20:30 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/3/10 10:54, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Hi Jia-Ju, > >> From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 10:39 PM >> On 2021/3/9 19:59, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: >>> Hi Jia-Ju, >>> >>> Thank you for the patch! >>> >>>> From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:01 PM >>>> >>>> When __usbhsf_pkt_get() returns NULL to pkt, no error return code of >>>> usbhsf_pkt_handler() is assigned. >>> Yes. Also I realized that no error return code of usbhsf_pkt_handler() >>> was assigned if the type value was unexpected value. So, I'm thinking >>> initial value of ret should be -EINVAL instead of 0. >> This is okay to me. >> Need I write a new patch for this? > Thank you for your reply. I can write such a new patch with your > Reported-by for this as minor refactoring of the usbhsf_pkt_handler(). > May I write such a patch? Okay, sure :) Best wishes, Jia-Ju Bai