Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965216AbWJBSLY (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:11:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965217AbWJBSLY (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:11:24 -0400 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:40626 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965216AbWJBSLX (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:11:23 -0400 Message-ID: <452156F4.4050004@pathscale.com> Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:14:12 -0700 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 23 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Have you tested your driver against the -mm tree? No. > To the best of my knowledge the irq handling of your hypertransport card > is a complete and total hack that works only by chance. And a happy Monday morning to you, too :-) > In the -mm tree I have added a first pass at proper support for the > hypertranport interrupt capability. As this code is slated to go into > 2.6.19 could you please test against that? I'm on vacation for a few weeks. We'll find someone to do it.