Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp350658pxf; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:38:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6qJWxe+y/Ad+pboteoMkHoT1lfAsyvEy9qdbog4JBwcQE04C0Yb3Obuf2b4dg44MlSiu+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1c13:: with SMTP id k19mr4368489ejg.457.1615390717071; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:38:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615390717; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GY4MIGiWxLQ7PIFJrMMlmXF0ktzQG9fPpSkbW+y5xhu/+6zsQXU9oELMm0iBBkdZOJ PQWKp6M7fgNMXDFeV/OZZkSPbxp/VxZzH691OorDdRhGG9F/WM27xPfSdiI+2yukefIa CdP8EuugMCwQshpcnhhY9Uoae6WRUkt6IRuw1/zVOJ3NAfoP8SmEbVjhtbjWJz8JoBsz TSvOErfr+d1Qs6BnFvJ49+5+sxSTodgbWLmXmCAGHtj1zLg84GY9wc6PKGn35SOTjwqJ Oq3DXlsbu/eRpX/ZXxOG2c4U5oBsViyILLIXlj9QK+H06bza7Tg0s/30VodcYnddP3kd b3uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=A/E9kQ5Uo1gvORiM39VYVMz1qLELRHsxm4ZfQ2Ba1Pc=; b=DliE85fEWzSpRNlatgJLvsrr5/Q8ycSr6M5ZHS1H0jj+DTrii2yKplagLyt7sscsYU jI2E+pEQjIHq79vbHylijKZMpk4BmGXGLbRQRqsgRcbW5PuYrfQVfmfiMy6yySl2QHpo 7O0w52M+zbnT5BGEoC5pFbOAhickTvp4P/tIYIq7hET1rMvyJxMSiCicZYnO1VxhgsN6 xmi86D+M6OcDVtL537b0TCLA5sTx6k2USNKF/ze3i5TXVBNdIUlyXrKjgMVI/T4uOb6O +sPFhhy1EdWBvBiH47SaPAzJ/FCzQB8UnorkFW+bW1Zn4asd/kKkbMl5qw1T9WGtcEgw VV4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="C/fYb1rP"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si11177838ejn.701.2021.03.10.07.38.14; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b="C/fYb1rP"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232405AbhCJPgc (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:36:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46266 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231666AbhCJPgL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:36:11 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB52AC061760 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id d20so19491397oiw.10 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A/E9kQ5Uo1gvORiM39VYVMz1qLELRHsxm4ZfQ2Ba1Pc=; b=C/fYb1rPn2lYTjZyilsNcgD7bmyM8JrocFqLFJxMLeXFKg9Qc+8QqaeWRzFq0hp4Oo I8hgW4GJuGst0rt6Za/ivCnF1vrlGxChnH4ZApcMQDcsEFcg0K9RswuQ7VirYad+xRSU syPPzylCP/oR7GQefNgiQpGqUUvuOKK7RtL71c7yYapai5imZhSRYf6bUR4ahdUXCLsS Ogne7nKas/vVBtYZGTQF89YLcGODyA906cNgRYxaiNEkoYH/ioht8010m7Qf6gNsFt24 UdUH5u4WzFMGHmsZdtapQnuguz5Q9w9h+vafSd3PXLg8T7amjuqMgF/fnwInolEmMtX7 ZuBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A/E9kQ5Uo1gvORiM39VYVMz1qLELRHsxm4ZfQ2Ba1Pc=; b=A9HXSSwfZpIec2U7GB6IWtfsfsmg6Xekvq2i39b0qf3wIrUsCvd8IpvxaUAWcLh0Iu cq/PRIVupbUM+G0FwOMwa7A165hSdxtAUA1soZETIixznz2oozQYRXg4LER+nqrTRsM+ AuzT9ve/3TNZM727jkXcBEIN1G6Q8Bcg3lKyz0uajGqS5z2/+B9w2mgfv5eMHdb8gOeD EMuP85uXyOkf2w/8OPcGmeoj7tHCnMCeUqr9bpUkaIhCaDUhtIsWHBf5m8ho+fYCn826 HxavITDIOuhq842kCLSDGLE6lQLH7bEPzlOtXBoGfRnfkFtc/99vT4lxLbClCVkKfJiW VlXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316lWP/MnKYIa+SJwYkfDgK6oLNKmbsiqmf+LRx/jDawrx9742Y 6kX9nV3Et6ppuK3q6unhv13Y7csobMXexhr0oyri/A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1450:: with SMTP id x16mr2773457oiv.6.1615390569935; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:36:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210310152333.1291338-1-ak@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210310152333.1291338-1-ak@linux.intel.com> From: Jim Mattson Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 07:35:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/kvm: Fix inverted pebs_no_isolation check To: Andi Kleen Cc: Peter Zijlstra , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:24 AM Andi Kleen wrote: > > The pebs_no_isolation optimization check is inverted. We want to disable > PEBS isolation when the microcode is at least the revision in the table, > not for older microcode. So remove the extra !. The original code was correct because of the double negative. A "good" CPU _has_ PEBS isolation. It's bad to have pebs_no_isolation.