Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp411507pxf; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:40:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLBmE3Qv3tzHCqEd9JUNP2YZcSMxf8NnU8frVTEvLjxYSHNdrru0iXGnefgWRWowV6MzOz X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:35c8:: with SMTP id z8mr4293043edc.341.1615394401576; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:40:01 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615394401; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mycebLdbFD9bus9ld18u1qBQPielrJM7egd3sUwGl87hrT8ajWFGDYEcYJQHm0a9Bd +YtSby6Q7rhezzfBhlqVn5JZnsK+ouzzyKZhLfY5T+JxiGsFib9jjpeiOIVBsHEPHcTl AQIqG/YXURv8vOg86xiFNL4zwRIUOWdH6e+EmBubR0gf7b9roOjABRTnptVELcIq+ul/ RZ+CcrBfG/ZIiSijDK5Fit8b1DQiVZFSyCMoAHmdZ1kjozWfibqtHagHVCWOilpJRA3h IXeDK352P9kO6wby8FtykN5EM+YEMTsZv8Okne60D9bm2al6VnS/XMmYcpmongVv/t+z opLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=/CrtEGvFBsaetkSc4zvy5lpmoL+mks5CqiT6a0oBrxc=; b=rLqdQSlESbYQ5W/uRS9lkxxKq+HBVZpwg+0EncShyY4CTS3My9yjb93WjzEejUKjGP hRSg3IQKC+tQdkCkqVrUvr3m2hvn04BmzHSoSrFR+WlawHdinlxBqsFQnf4OYSNE3WHO iPAu2P38+zBkvjr2L0wU6DTFr4PljU8XwuZOjpLCKCUfp+7C+lcRXEcpGPU2KNvZx/+s UJNfMh74sVuDAopHTrb9VM+ODdEzBndfGpbsFIdzW2oAvWVLL2cyr2fYjR8FIJVvs4mq WoHL4T9C11VbdHflcujxiV0YLPcK9F530vDJw6qNOYypnW/gBgTnNsam2pLF4iO4rRH6 iAag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z15si5929704ejr.694.2021.03.10.08.39.37; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:40:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232846AbhCJQhq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:37:46 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35854 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229467AbhCJQh1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:37:27 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01531ABD7; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:37:25 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Mark Brown Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Kai Vehmanen , Liam Girdwood , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Ranjani Sridharan , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Jon Hunter , Bard liao Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ASoC: soc-core: Prevent warning if no DMI table is present In-Reply-To: <20210310161814.GA28564@sirena.org.uk> References: <20210303115526.419458-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com> <91480f92-a3f5-e71f-acdc-ea74488ab0a1@linux.intel.com> <20210310133534.GD4746@sirena.org.uk> <6a2352e6-f2b7-def1-de58-52fbeb7846e5@linux.intel.com> <20210310161814.GA28564@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:18:14 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 09:44:07AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 3/10/21 7:35 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Just change it to a system level check for ACPI, checking for OF would > > > leave problems for board files or any other alternative firmware > > > interfaces. > > > did you mean if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)) ? > > Is there a runtime check? Well, basically both DMI and ACPI are completely different things, so I don't think it's right to check the availability of ACPI as a signal of the availability of DMI. Takashi