Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6660750.UgobAMfxrE@kreacher> <CAJZ5v0gCobMbDGt80exScjpGgjnbo+5kMtB6qsx1wfOf6QyiJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210310160851.GA331077@ninjato>
In-Reply-To: <20210310160851.GA331077@ninjato>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:50:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iOsPuNkmmH2cWY=u6C_1stkPKhUtbYM4DYvwt=EYtNAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-scmi: Drop unused ACPI_MODULE_NAME definition
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:08 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 03:47:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > >
> > > The ACPI_MODULE_NAME() definition is only used by the message
> > > printing macros from ACPICA that are not used by the code in
> > > question, so it is redundant.  Drop it.
> > >
> > > No functional impact.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > If there are no concerns regarding this, I'll queue it up for 5.13 in
> > the ACPI tree, thanks!
>
> I'd prefer the I2C tree a tad to avoid conflicts. Any reason for the
> ACPI tree?

There are some patches doing this type of a cleanup in the ACPI tree,
but this is the only reason, so please route it through the i2c tree
if that is preferred.