Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965381AbWJBTcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:32:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965378AbWJBTcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:32:05 -0400 Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70]:33664 "EHLO elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965381AbWJBTcC (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:32:02 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=QJH9JtEB8/I7/kvbREUsEuAXME0KDH4+SY2Aev1KD9D9B+1Vl8F10tJF2MufDfMf; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Message-ID: <010a01c6e659$65a7a040$0225a8c0@Wednesday> From: "jdow" To: "Linus Torvalds" , Cc: "linux-kernel" References: <1159539793.7086.91.camel@mindpipe> <20061002100302.GS16047@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1159802486.4067.140.camel@mindpipe> <45212F39.5000307@mbligh.org> <1159811392.8907.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200610021822.k92IMo44008167@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Subject: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:31:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120fe5f52ac02aa33cbe406ba2c3732274d9822d29d99174f51350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.187.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1307 Lines: 30 From: "Linus Torvalds" > On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: >> >> How did OSDL's MX checking deal with split in/out configurations like ours, >> where our MX points at a load-balanced farm of Mirapoint front end appliances >> with 1 IP address, but our main off-campus *outbound* comes from a different >> address? > > Hey, if I knew what I was doing, I'd be in MIS. > > As it is, I just criticise other peoples patches. DK or DKIM comes to mind. SpamAssassin 3.1.5 handles it neatly. Off hand expecting a list to maintain perfect anti-spam is rather difficult. Distributed processing works better. Folks should have their own anti-spam tools and train them to their own preferences. (It helps with a list like this one to have a SpamAssassin meta rule that boosts the scores for BAYES_80 and above while reducing scores for BAYES_40 and below. It also helps to run a lot of the SARE, SpamAssassin Rules Emporium, rule sets. Pick and choose for your particular needs. http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules) {^_^} Joanne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/