Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:38:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:38:47 -0500 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:55454 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:38:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:08:28 -0500 (EST) From: Alexander Viro To: "Richard B. Johnson" cc: Michael Rothwell , Linux kernel Subject: Re: Advanced Linux Kernel/Enterprise Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote: > > > "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > > Multics??? [..] way too many persons on this list who know the history of > > > Unix to try this BS. > > > > So, you're saying their nine goals were bullshit? Multics had a lot of > > problems. But it did a lot of ground-breaking. Perhaps you should reply > > to the nine goals, or the general topic of "Enterpriseness," rather than > > merely express your irrelevant hatred for Multics. > > > > Relating some "nine goals of 'Enterprise Computing'" to Multics is > the bullshit. When Multics was being developed, the singular goal > was to make an operating system that worked on DEC Equipment without > having to use DEC software. The emphasis was on trying to make it > work period. WTF are you smoking? Multics never ran on DEC hardware. Moreover, your ideas about UNIX history ("modified Multics bootloader" bit) are, well, interesting. Porting from GE to PDP-7... Besides, the thing had wildly different fs usage model - "everything is mmaped segment" vs. UNIX "everything is stream of characters". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/