Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp650886pxf; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:17:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDh9cFEEeAqyqkFWuTkbUWPWX9SIgJSONJegSGpY9EbdHX0VrfIdwfL/G0BzhmK4Mtpr+w X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d74b:: with SMTP id a11mr5544981eds.92.1615414660374; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:17:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615414660; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CT+/lw5SyTOsGyyKs0ku38ES/AvthJ1r7OhCSljsnTdwC5kcPLA/4YaEq5PgFt5jx5 D/5Sv6ND+2MXawxwLdeFNMeTmwS+p5b0J5URHPkFSzGgboJ7GCYIaS2+CFt9eitNQtuF B7Fkpf9UkXI7koMPTZtENL1Hndyb9nuB6gFO+UMmq4HdtEFsrlD9p84SGZuNQ7AAX0Mw 4kzbpETofAg6vBAQqjuX9NC30otaRDEEbWFxTE3fOEOKYqDPSwYcxl1AlqYGVSPCtrn5 BUiUrdKTx7KuEDJiqNmwcu42gGjm8ERVxNGzw+39Z+RbcaJZlJrxVv5HpOQbfHMPQQnN oOig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=ffrpK/8Uv3GdLuSCrRZ0sDJfDM09Y6maw8dufVL+J5s=; b=muWSFL5Q854Lwr4wqa7Iy1u5B/p2mtqaaTSX/BA3qw5B7AnIDM4clDjfSW7bo4w7f2 8M+5RdcoIE/c7d6SH2dEHC2mWIBNfgKMym8OUqttTm4r50yT3t3ejngOvSRhS/t71GFw fi3Uy3lgWW4J8R/hZj9wH9iFOucrhemHvIR4eAfcOZQHMPD5Jq7VRN6bNnzbZNRcmIKF 6ez97fiMxgd1i+2UMYk0yQCC1v/5Y2qqg6lTj656G2daMhGt8nqOpqfXwTRnWQrmPyJz 4kGny8eMu/iJx6oNI/3UEKzGQTUq+47Pn2FDU1QU1rT1odGEuPPeOhVPp+ZkAv2Uxbw4 oB/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g5si457576edy.61.2021.03.10.14.17.17; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233461AbhCJWNY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:13:24 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:60958 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229563AbhCJWNF (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 17:13:05 -0500 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lK74h-00DtU4-9O; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:13:03 -0700 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=fess.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lK74f-001ESM-Lp; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:13:02 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: qianli zhao , christian@brauner.io, axboe@kernel.dk, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Collingbourne , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qianli Zhao References: <1615296712-175334-1-git-send-email-zhaoqianligood@gmail.com> <20210309182657.GA1408@redhat.com> <20210310173236.GB8973@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:13:06 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20210310173236.GB8973@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:32:37 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1lK74f-001ESM-Lp;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19JTdV5RIzKGymacZ8wCcU3mj4/k7hHExw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4996] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Oleg Nesterov X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1020 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.26 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 10 (1.0%), parse: 0.96 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 3.5 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.07 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 5 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.46 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.40 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 739 (72.5%), check_bayes: 737 (72.3%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 631 (61.8%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 93 (9.1%), b_finish: 1.09 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 230 (22.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.57 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.6 (0.3%), poll_dns_idle: 0.47 (0.0%), tests_pri_10: 3.0 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 12 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] exit: trigger panic when init process is set to SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov writes: > On 03/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> /* If global init has exited, >> * panic immediately to get a useable coredump. >> */ >> if (unlikely(is_global_init(tsk) && >> (thread_group_empty(tsk) || >> (tsk->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)))) { >> panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n", >> tsk->signal->group_exit_code ?: (int)code); >> } >> >> The thread_group_empty test is needed to handle single threaded >> inits. > > But we can't rely on thread_group_empty(). Just suppose that the main > thread exit first, then the 2nd (last) thread exits too. It took me a minute. I think you are pointing out that there is a case where we do not set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT and that init actually exits. The case where all of the threads do pthread_exit() aka do_exit(). I think that implies that to have a comprehensive test would need to do: group_dead = atomic_dec_and_test(&tsk->signal->live); /* If global init has exited, * panic immediately to get a useable coredump. */ if (unlikely(is_global_init(tsk) && (group_dead || thread_group_empty(tsk) || (tsk->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)))) { panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n", tsk->signal->group_exit_code ?: (int)code); } Leaving the test where it is. Yes. I think that should work. Eric