Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp392737pxf; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:29:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyDNV0Ax7W8E9pV6k0P1e36wBcj66PK4n3KiU0DuqsZ+W108v46N8HRfo/PNSLspiyvtsyF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3295:: with SMTP id 21mr3341989ejw.88.1615472997936; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:29:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615472997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KBJMtXzeR5ln5Phk/4qaLRrOEM7kv9j8nexBDKE3Kq2Kd+V73gIb0Hl6KPP52GXMsZ Jl7LGnjDi69FKiUHNaxIvjQjSAutzCn3yf5Z9HX/Ib43mplnl/2z04oMSuupXikqEXgX ZBnGTdPTp9xmqwV25Uya9HumztQeeFVigzhR69iSIJuvNwaJdhDW1IvpJkGal689qCnc 4JFTMkJZM5yiVylW2sG0Gn2VbWFtJ59TM5UUbH8nxfDHFOGemmQ0GbzuhaFF8j0Qe0Fq DHCs9+m8mej4/76vR29oxuOFLJOwL9tLp5I8YQA1eAPHjNwAKM1WDsU92z2h4A/Ph+0a aiVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=63YDpGp9frKccP88qvw0k2kmIlI7tO5h1NwfcTu3CvU=; b=vHxpsHiYAMkXG4VGin7gJuhX10As5rsfWN12FT7rC6C2YGCXtj059trfa91Lg4XorP T0GzkLXnp7Ilufuzx5Rg7rOwFqOBg5bc+HWjN/MnBQ0LW9p/sj3tc0eMlqCUkCfdf8mc ZrKsYlUybB/I4APNRIdE+liK+dGB1l+pwhOpIDpKoRTnd/7W+6c6IpOtu8/g6caWkmkg Q0HpPj4vEL/sooftdX1rGM2K6YVh3l1qlAGrM1QsAOA0x6vmhmlbSG5zrGICBMv6AE6X 4GnPiQBOhZTqfRikDX5o5uJJcjVypzEJiy+djmuB8S0mdiCFl3QpdPpYGIanFIdAkl1W yZMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c26si1884433eds.593.2021.03.11.06.29.35; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 06:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233670AbhCKO2K (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:28:10 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51310 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233300AbhCKO2B (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:28:01 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF9EAC16; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:27:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andy Shevchenko , ALSA Development Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ALSA: hda/realtek: Sort alphanumerically the SND_PCI_QUIRK() entries. In-Reply-To: References: <20210311132741.80989-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:22:22 +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 3:40 PM Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:27:41 +0100, > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > Sort alphanumerically the SND_PCI_QUIRK() entries for better maintenance. > > > No functional change implied. > > > > I'd love to apply this kind of cleanups (and I do sometimes > > partially), but practically seen, this may make the stable backporting > > significantly harder because many quirk patches are backported to the > > very old LTS kernels. So, unless any specific reason (e.g. some > > entries doubled or wrongly applied) is given, I'd avoid this full > > plastic surgery. > > Btw, can we apply the hunks that are against the lines under #if 0? > At least it will reduce the chaos rate in the file w/o worrying that > people will add entries there to backport. If the #if-0-block causes a problem, we can drop it, too. There are two big ones, and those have been disabled for almost a decade already, so it's quite safe to drop them. Takashi