Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:15:43 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To:     Jim Newsome <jnewsome@torproject.org>
Cc:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] do_wait: make PIDTYPE_PID case O(1) instead of O(n)
Message-ID: <20210311151542.GB15552@redhat.com>
References: <20210309203919.15920-1-jnewsome@torproject.org>
 <m1blbqmy2u.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
 <4d9006b4-b65a-6ce0-b367-971f29de1f21@torproject.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4d9006b4-b65a-6ce0-b367-971f29de1f21@torproject.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Precedence: bulk

On 03/10, Jim Newsome wrote:
>
> On 3/10/21 16:40, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> >> +static int do_wait_pid(struct wait_opts *wo)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct task_struct *target = pid_task(wo->wo_pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> >                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This is subtle change in behavior.
> >
> > Today on the task->children list we only place thread group leaders.
>
> Shouldn't we allow waiting on clone children if __WALL or __WCLONE is set?

Don't confuse clone child with child's sub-thread.

Oleg.