Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:52:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:52:13 -0500 Received: from web13105.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.150]:13321 "HELO web13105.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:51:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20011107165153.91027.qmail@web13105.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:51:53 -0800 (PST) From: szonyi calin Subject: Q:Howto benchmark preemptible kernel ? To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, rml@tech9.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi I'm have a Cyrix 486/66 with 12Megs of ram. I'm using preemptible patches from quite some time now. (2.4.10- 2.4.13) I was using both Robert Love and Andrew Morton's patch. I would like to do some benhmarks but there are some issues: 1. The system is slow and has low memory so a big benchmark is out of question (compiling the kernel take 4 hours if i don't touch the console) 2. The benchmark must be small and adequate (patching the kernel to make a benchmark is out of discussion) Any ideas ? (No i don't have money to buy a new machine, I win 200$/month, a new pc (crappy) is 350-400$ (in my country)). I did run (some time ago, without preemptible kernel) some benchmarks (bonnie, and bytebench or something) but it was no improvement (1% maybe ) whatever I have done with hdparm or vm tweaking. P.S. (for Andrew ) Will there be a patch for 2.4.14 ? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find a job, post your resume. http://careers.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/