Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030632AbWJCWcH (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:32:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030633AbWJCWcG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:32:06 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:37300 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030618AbWJCWcD (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:32:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:30:29 -0400 From: Theodore Tso To: Jean Tourrilhes Cc: "John W. Linville" , Dan Williams , Alessandro Suardi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , hostap@shmoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing Message-ID: <20061003223029.GA26351@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Jean Tourrilhes , "John W. Linville" , Dan Williams , Alessandro Suardi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , hostap@shmoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20061002111537.baa077d2.akpm@osdl.org> <20061002185550.GA14854@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <200610022147.03748.rjw@sisk.pl> <1159822831.11771.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061002212604.GA6520@thunk.org> <5a4c581d0610021508hdc331f0w7c9b71c3944d4d8b@mail.gmail.com> <1159877574.2879.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061003124902.GB23912@tuxdriver.com> <20061003133845.GG2930@thunk.org> <20061003172327.GA17443@bougret.hpl.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061003172327.GA17443@bougret.hpl.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1559 Lines: 33 On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:23:27AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > In the past, I personally tried to upgrade Red-Hat Workstation > 4 with a pristine 2.6 kernel. This was far from trivial, as Red-Hat > did compile their kernel with some weird options/patches, and > userspace (libc) were expecting those. I (well, me and my team) am supporting a customer using a RHEL 4 userspace and a 2.6.16 kernel with Ingo's real-time patches. We just used Red Hat config file as the basis, and it wasn't that hard. There were some initrd breakages, which I've complained about in the past, but the goal is that this sort of thing is supposed to work! (And for the most part, it does). > On the other hand, I've been personally running the latest > 2.6.X kernels on Debian stable for as long as 2.6.X was > available. And, things *do* break, in the past I had trouble with > module tools, I can't run devfs or udev, Pcmcia is on the verge of > breaking, etc... I'm currently using the latest 2.6 kernel with Ubuntu 6.06 (their stable release), and to date, I haven't had any problems. Of course, that may be about to change, given that Ubuntu is shipping with wireless-tools version "27+28pre13-1ub", which I assume is a version between 27 and 28. Do you know off-hand whether this is is WE-21 capable? - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/