Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Ira Weiny <iweiny@intel.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Jakowski Andrzej <andrzej.jakowski@intel.com>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@intel.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
References: <20210311233142.7900-1-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20210311233142.7900-8-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20210313023657.GC3402637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Message-ID: <e9a6689a-3cb7-aa30-33e7-b27015754b73@deltatee.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:33:13 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210313023657.GC3402637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] dma-mapping: Add flags to dma_map_ops to
 indicate PCI P2PDMA support
Precedence: bulk


On 2021-03-12 7:36 p.m., Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:31:37PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>  
>> +int dma_pci_p2pdma_supported(struct device *dev)
>    ^^^
>   bool?

Sure.

> 
>> +{
>> +	const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>> +
>> +	return !ops || ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED;
> 
> Is this logic correct?  I would have expected.
> 
> 	return (ops && ops->flags & DMA_F_PCI_P2PDMA_SUPPORTED);


If ops is NULL then the operations in kernel/dma/direct.c are used and
support is added to those in patch 6. So it is correct as written.

Logan