Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Ira Weiny <iweiny@intel.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Jakowski Andrzej <andrzej.jakowski@intel.com>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@intel.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>
References: <20210311233142.7900-1-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20210311233142.7900-5-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20210313023220.GB3402637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Message-ID: <d34a2035-6077-8070-ea2c-b62a4a65422c@deltatee.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 10:30:45 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210313023220.GB3402637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Introduce
 pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus() and pci_p2pdma_bus_offset()
Precedence: bulk


On 2021-03-12 7:32 p.m., Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:31:34PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Introduce pci_p2pdma_should_map_bus() which is meant to be called by
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 	    pci_p2pdma_dma_map_type() ???
> 
> FWIW I find this name confusing with pci_p2pdma_map_type() and looking at the
> implementation I'm not clear why pci_p2pdma_dma_map_type() needs to exist?

Yeah, there are subtle differences in prototype. But yes, they can
probably be combined. Will do for future postings.

>> + * pci_p2pdma_dma_map_type - determine if a DMA mapping should use the
>> + *	bus address, be mapped normally or fail
>> + * @dev: device doing the DMA request
>> + * @pgmap: dev_pagemap structure for the mapping
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + *    1 - if the page should be mapped with a bus address,
>> + *    0 - if the page should be mapped normally through an IOMMU mapping or
>> + *        physical address; or
>> + *   -1 - if the device should not map the pages and an error should be
>> + *        returned
>> + */
>> +int pci_p2pdma_dma_map_type(struct device *dev, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_p2pdma_pagemap *p2p_pgmap = to_p2p_pgmap(pgmap);
>> +	struct pci_dev *client;
>> +
>> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
>> +		return -1;
>> +
>> +	client = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +
>> +	switch (pci_p2pdma_map_type(p2p_pgmap->provider, client)) {
>> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_THRU_HOST_BRIDGE:
>> +		return 0;
>> +	case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_BUS_ADDR:
>> +		return 1;
>> +	default:
>> +		return -1;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_p2pdma_dma_map_type);
> 
> I guess the main point here is to export this to the DMA layer?

Yes, that's correct.

Logan