Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:41:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:41:38 -0500 Received: from f218.law9.hotmail.com ([64.4.9.218]:16659 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:41:32 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [128.2.152.69] From: "William Knop" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel. Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:41:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2001 19:41:27.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[30A141D0:01C167C4] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>Here's my go at a new design for /proc. I designed it from a userland >>point of view and tried not to drown myself into details. > >Did you have to change the subject line. It makes it harder to kill >file >when people keep doing that You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat. Will Knop w_knop@hotmail.com _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/