Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4042547pxf; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 04:28:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRTn0OdzwOwUnlrvX3DqUOuUkxFe3zVVrARtu7ssdRDG5i8UnVUxge4JzB1Z3PwysuqcH3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:32da:: with SMTP id k26mr29009383ejk.483.1615894124890; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 04:28:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615894124; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lljGsWtImNC1i0Q/1pYsWxnBXpenbFjIIVvYwDCbOx71Gm5O5W4Z1UQxqFhHMU5NnU O08UUnDG3OEA+o5gACCtR/iX10nu10H4bgxaNHVm2P8rg8zHUK8CmSxygbOhN8oGi59t bXJd1vIPHIkPoS/myEIHxIm5d/l8XP1Tg07BmfgAr13m93DyoRxKumI15jJn+sIxjfFY b1GwlrIipH4id2StKVGJbDIZtq/QlVEVBTD99sCTsnHaojSgxb+3icLA0YyfmpFTw6aT NY6jgWInTpwoJyQ28+5lUXwMP9JgUyaGluAEMvnSOyRQWsV8ll1T16mRWlS1GBKNPXLm JhqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:from:subject:dkim-signature; bh=db9micwEwwafqaoj4CzYn012LqXy/DzubQNuOVlOulQ=; b=KAxs8HIEj/4mBAkoI3JOpgrhTF7j2ndfWt/ijfMPUSP37flx9108/EUmtcF0VP2EQZ 5pg8omkY7P48X1uwR8W/bc/uVHoYedSVzZy7tjTO3OaRuBfrIbe3jmTN5HqKpMLRbNJb OeSzW5WgTy757IAel4krdIkMRZm6O+XLfW79Lo3t4YOc+rIqg9g8V0BnbvEo6+V6qYVQ sek0vtfR7zBAglQA/2b0GflbpfRVo22y6i+TH5jUly+NrcA6sW5pwywqELB0F4yr2AQV iJor3MyO0+wm8fRFR4zaKp5vtAj6cvokC409TcAWCgzYOnGcxPNxsGmEB1XuJPj3IYH7 pNvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kaspersky.com header.s=mail202102 header.b=k03vt0qR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=kaspersky.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x27si12844440edi.240.2021.03.16.04.28.21; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 04:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kaspersky.com header.s=mail202102 header.b=k03vt0qR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=kaspersky.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231645AbhCPDh6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:37:58 -0400 Received: from mx12.kaspersky-labs.com ([91.103.66.155]:62970 "EHLO mx12.kaspersky-labs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229747AbhCPDhj (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:37:39 -0400 Received: from relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (unknown [127.0.0.10]) by relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C868B7637D; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:37:32 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaspersky.com; s=mail202102; t=1615865852; bh=db9micwEwwafqaoj4CzYn012LqXy/DzubQNuOVlOulQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k03vt0qREuuLN+dn40WPo2N73kaC+ry8EzUOdb5iOImzQlNFzFizAZ41dFTU1FuHy HkUQlJQQR2oiD5uti5xYio4Xyc9RCaJqgrI5i6yzQoMhtWaxYTiDnhhDnf96Kh4L5K p2T2lk5A76IcbWwj0tf92TtFG8PHRArIlx0VKz2HPua1QvhjYR8WZ0sVJ/D/USGa7E PvOWrf/036tB0Y1WiZIGzJGMQPZDa4DZiYQOd7UwHtni6cs9ZQZ7BIJsYKxiOalXfQ qM27ETkuA7oPi8s4d5AXfEI3dwx4HOwpwW7auj73wcUOQDBwiG9IfTDzDq6S5cGh8n mH7cit05haHrw== Received: from mail-hq2.kaspersky.com (unknown [91.103.66.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail-hq2.kaspersky.com", Issuer "Kaspersky MailRelays CA G3" (verified OK)) by mailhub12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9FA276342; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:37:31 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [10.16.171.77] (10.64.68.128) by hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:37:30 +0300 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 00/22] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support From: Arseny Krasnov To: Stefano Garzarella CC: Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jorgen Hansen , Norbert Slusarek , Andra Paraschiv , Colin Ian King , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stsp2@yandex.ru" , "oxffffaa@gmail.com" References: <20210307175722.3464068-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> <20210315114027.neacovpmw3nzz77z@steredhat> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:37:31 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.64.68.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: hqmailmbx2.avp.ru (10.64.67.242) To hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) X-KSE-ServerInfo: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.20, Database issued on: 03/16/2021 03:25:10 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 162411 [Mar 15 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 436 436 4977b9bfeabc3816a6da3614ba6703afbb88002c X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.20.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2;kaspersky.com:7.1.1 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 03/16/2021 03:27:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 15.03.2021 23:57:00 X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 52 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2021/03/16 02:36:00 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2021/03/15 23:34:00 #16430969 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15.03.2021 18:22, Arseny Krasnov wrote: > On 15.03.2021 14:40, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> Hi Arseny, >> >> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 08:57:19PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >>> This patchset implements support of SOCK_SEQPACKET for virtio >>> transport. >>> As SOCK_SEQPACKET guarantees to save record boundaries, so to >>> do it, two new packet operations were added: first for start of record >>> and second to mark end of record(SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END later). Also, >>> both operations carries metadata - to maintain boundaries and payload >>> integrity. Metadata is introduced by adding special header with two >>> fields - message id and message length: >>> >>> struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr { >>> __le32 msg_id; >>> __le32 msg_len; >>> } __attribute__((packed)); >>> >>> This header is transmitted as payload of SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END >>> packets(buffer of second virtio descriptor in chain) in the same way as >>> data transmitted in RW packets. Payload was chosen as buffer for this >>> header to avoid touching first virtio buffer which carries header of >>> packet, because someone could check that size of this buffer is equal >>> to size of packet header. To send record, packet with start marker is >>> sent first(it's header carries length of record and id),then all data >>> is sent as usual 'RW' packets and finally SEQ_END is sent(it carries >>> id of message, which is equal to id of SEQ_BEGIN), also after sending >>> SEQ_END id is incremented. On receiver's side,size of record is known >> >from packet with start record marker. To check that no packets were >>> dropped by transport, 'msg_id's of two sequential SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END >>> are checked to be equal and length of data between two markers is >>> compared to then length in SEQ_BEGIN header. >>> Now as packets of one socket are not reordered neither on >>> vsock nor on vhost transport layers, such markers allows to restore >>> original record on receiver's side. If user's buffer is smaller that >>> record length, when all out of size data is dropped. >>> Maximum length of datagram is not limited as in stream socket, >>> because same credit logic is used. Difference with stream socket is >>> that user is not woken up until whole record is received or error >>> occurred. Implementation also supports 'MSG_EOR' and 'MSG_TRUNC' flags. >>> Tests also implemented. >>> >>> Thanks to stsp2@yandex.ru for encouragements and initial design >>> recommendations. >>> >>> Arseny Krasnov (22): >>> af_vsock: update functions for connectible socket >>> af_vsock: separate wait data loop >>> af_vsock: separate receive data loop >>> af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop >>> af_vsock: separate wait space loop >>> af_vsock: implement send logic for SEQPACKET >>> af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support >>> af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets >>> virtio/vsock: set packet's type in virtio_transport_send_pkt_info() >>> virtio/vsock: simplify credit update function API >>> virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET >>> virtio/vsock: fetch length for SEQPACKET record >>> virtio/vsock: add SEQPACKET receive logic >>> virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support >>> virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit >>> vhost/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support >>> virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support >>> virtio/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport >>> vhost/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport >>> vsock/loopback: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport >>> vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests >>> virtio/vsock: update trace event for SEQPACKET >>> >>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 22 +- >>> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 22 + >>> include/net/af_vsock.h | 10 + >>> .../events/vsock_virtio_transport_common.h | 48 +- >>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 19 + >>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 589 +++++++++++------ >>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 18 + >>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 364 ++++++++-- >>> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 13 + >>> tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 32 +- >>> tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 3 + >>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 126 ++++ >>> 12 files changed, 1013 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-) >>> >>> v5 -> v6: >>> General changelog: >>> - virtio transport specific callbacks which send SEQ_BEGIN or >>> SEQ_END now hidden inside virtio transport. Only enqueue, >>> dequeue and record length callbacks are provided by transport. >>> >>> - virtio feature bit for SEQPACKET socket support introduced: >>> VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET. >>> >>> - 'msg_cnt' field in 'struct virtio_vsock_seq_hdr' renamed to >>> 'msg_id' and used as id. >>> >>> Per patch changelog: >>> - 'af_vsock: separate wait data loop': >>> 1) Commit message updated. >>> 2) 'prepare_to_wait()' moved inside while loop(thanks to >>> Jorgen Hansen). >>> Marked 'Reviewed-by' with 1), but as 2) I removed R-b. >>> >>> - 'af_vsock: separate receive data loop': commit message >>> updated. >>> Marked 'Reviewed-by' with that fix. >>> >>> - 'af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop': style fixes. >>> >>> - 'af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support': >>> 1) 'module_put()' added when transport callback check failed. >>> 2) Now only 'seqpacket_allow()' callback called to check >>> support of SEQPACKET by transport. >>> >>> - 'af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets': commit message >>> updated. >>> Marked 'Reviewed-by' with that fix. >>> >>> - 'virtio/vsock: set packet's type in send': >>> 1) Commit message updated. >>> 2) Parameter 'type' from 'virtio_transport_send_credit_update()' >>> also removed in this patch instead of in next. >>> >>> - 'virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET': SEQPACKET >>> related state wrapped to special struct. >>> >>> - 'virtio/vsock: update trace event for SEQPACKET': format strings >>> now not broken by new lines. >> I left a bunch of comments in the patches, I hope they are easy to fix >> :-) > Thank you, yes, there are still small fixes. So one more question, this is final review for this version of patchset and can prepare next version with fixes? All other patches will reviewed in next version? Thank You >> Thanks for the changelogs. About 'per patch changelog', it is very >> useful! >> Just a suggestion, I think is better to include them in each patch after >> the '---' to simplify the review. > Ack >> You can use git-notes(1) or you can simply edit the format-patch and add >> the changelog after the 3 dashes, so that they are ignored when the >> patch is applied. >> >> Thanks, >> Stefano >> >>