Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp4445862pxf; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:46:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmqpPGzUG7qocaVG50DuGq2BzP7ixS/uz3G6CmEa6ZIF7yku9hKUdrRWdbdSGU1W6S6ATP X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3409:: with SMTP id c9mr31297007ejb.314.1615927580049; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:46:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615927580; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rhOM211n5+38aE8GOmBBfHAciDGQ0NKr/vZFpLThVKWKn4cVpDKNEFSa9UXAVNJS5w 8BUbGCDiDmvkM1t1Zd6WwZATn81shwg9DvzlllyAYG/kWMRUwuExS8q6p01Vg+qBH9sM c7yGOW4lfXKgHs4k5sEiU/H6f4OuNPho7taCJdRbC+/yR5LegkMNZuqJ9dt0pkHvo5E8 aGTyaBE3GxDgXYsvRR3+uYV43tXtLZ/k41nwJlZJCMOdilSBYSLJrtPXm7Dm9oj4/8Vq +bkCDly2jKAFov7waC/40y7O6xZtgTwPq8f0b/naUqfQoJZQa3FJxv1XUxOwj238DtwQ /d2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-language:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=MZGPrYDF6E6aOTzt9R3SamIeMYgGuJN616G7W//Ypvw=; b=HE4yeDJw3YxQvuFc6b/L0oAb4r/Jg9hwObrknRmYy/VVBMMyy7DUxk0JtS94AQjpjS nFOdQa8Hb9rlF8uzPYGZyORiEnQHFqehv4msLxLabLszNWxHmMYhXPRUvHuCLDaXBC0u oppbPns7L+KNdbhGxt0MbrbQMSvkBaY8Z45xXP1z7AMtNpcvExSHuKAeBIPp4P9ku30c x54qsw/rACPqyMuGmddVr/9BU14xHwW1JS6s4QJSBF5KOvEELphDVbZ1h9f4cEtH6iug 2Z7y4aPb6ZQtyHcxoK9yLeNBMRPjmJIYjpp6yQPA4W1LNln+NM47QOxoz03c2CpPnULw Wcig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b10si4722138edd.9.2021.03.16.13.45.57; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231877AbhCPPsb (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:48:31 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:13550 "EHLO szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237321AbhCPPsY (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:48:24 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4F0Hgp52WZzNnjl; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:45:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.244] (10.174.177.244) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:48:18 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: Fix jump_label config To: Cong Wang CC: Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Network Developers , LKML References: <20210224153803.91194-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <1cf51ae7-3bce-3b9f-f6aa-c20499eedf7a@huawei.com> From: Kefeng Wang Message-ID: <2a9d5d65-bf6c-7c41-113c-6297e3826b91@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 23:48:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.244] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/2/27 4:19, Cong Wang wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:39 PM Kefeng Wang wrote: >> >> On 2021/2/26 5:22, Cong Wang wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:03 AM Kefeng Wang wrote: >>>> HAVE_JUMP_LABLE is removed by commit e9666d10a567 ("jump_label: move >>>> 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig"), use CONFIG_JUMP_LABLE instead >>>> of HAVE_JUMP_LABLE. >>>> >>>> Fixes: 971502d77faa ("bridge: netfilter: unroll NF_HOOK helper in bridge input path") >>>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang >>> Hmm, why do we have to use a macro here? static_key_false() is defined >>> in both cases, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y or CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=n. >> It seems that all nf_hooks_needed related are using the macro, >> >> see net/netfilter/core.c and include/linux/netfilter.h, >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL >> struct static_key nf_hooks_needed[NFPROTO_NUMPROTO][NF_MAX_HOOKS]; >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_hooks_needed); >> #endif >> >> nf_static_key_inc()/nf_static_key_dec() > Same question: why? Clearly struct static_key is defined in both cases: Hi Cong,  the nf_hooks_needed is wrapped up by this macro, so this place should use it, or we will meet the build issue,  thanks. ../net/bridge/br_input.c: In function ‘nf_hook_bridge_pre’: ../net/bridge/br_input.c:211:25: error: ‘nf_hooks_needed’ undeclared (first use in this function)   211 |  if (!static_key_false(&nf_hooks_needed[NFPROTO_BRIDGE][NF_BR_PRE_ROUTING])) > > #else > struct static_key { > atomic_t enabled; > }; > #endif /* CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */ > > Thanks. >