Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp133445pxf; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:59:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXdZ6v136TWeHE4qpuDU6PXavQcgOeHZYx5PcNnEJ5w9ryXZ1/p8ejmFMg1mCQB83h2buX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a6e:: with SMTP id hy14mr34556959ejc.356.1615967942177; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:59:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615967942; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tRKe+rl0wAzvxJ+e8RUe2iTNVCbiGGQWtpHOk5FZUVlJykmfd+FzM0do4/fjUvitcX sLcsFITrhX64RMc1YTEwsE7/NI0ceAe2TuvOLlH3/yXD2iDcZwfoN3BvFK36+U4DC66x TN7Mrkbu6L5kQWXf61Dz2S+m9Ubc8Y3FyBntNcvP3SrypGy/wcJxuGdtUbC8TAlbxV0g oGVRYI/XplXzvy/4QoJa6X7XuxTguBLFJz1Rrh93+cP7RL9qzV3nPxrQSW3Pef2zgcwL iF0h9hOOO92NGpBTJWFIqPWyHwvMb4YZzSz0lSXoSeyMwZCAZbQ2aWkIoB9H8AMwPppV gVhw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Tgbv8H1zWmRW3xcKMivNBd2e4YpHRpaiWHvwdkD1QP4=; b=APWrfLQ7B5tdencazRzB2IucW+3Q3gQMvqi/62cAFu4fwFG0ar6qd3r2nThtSkYsAT HdBViwswr4sK61wW92lU+MG2eCYHKU8VzApxOwOw4Xej+lN+eVVObaLx99p1x4IT/tUo tPGq15NNDOe2+AVKE4dcHjz7ZBKmlkgHzYq+OuGqe/QJ/gP+BRI4BbBytPvRIdPx79be IPjceqwzzQoTSGNnTsXNGrU/20wdJbpgMSKCmW4M+3xQCVpxrLVbHtPStL4aZI1E48Qa g/e4oGov7sIiKWcB7vHakj44GuW0O7iBV984sOz/qwdt0iSl8ysJiaOtHAJhlYRPd3Cb 8tCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dp18si16546746ejc.432.2021.03.17.00.58.39; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230389AbhCQHzd (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 03:55:33 -0400 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.132]:56783 "EHLO out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230358AbhCQHy6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 03:54:58 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R351e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=15;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0USESt7q_1615967692; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xlpang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0USESt7q_1615967692) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:54:52 +0800 From: Xunlei Pang To: Christoph Lameter , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Konstantin Khlebnikov , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , Shu Ming , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Wen Yang , James Wang , Xunlei Pang Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm/slub: Fix count_partial() problem Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:54:49 +0800 Message-Id: <1615967692-80524-1-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org count_partial() can hold n->list_lock spinlock for quite long, which makes much trouble to the system. This series eliminate this problem. v1->v2: - Improved changelog and variable naming for PATCH 1~2. - PATCH3 adds per-cpu counter to avoid performance regression in concurrent __slab_free(). v2->v3: - Changed "page->inuse" to the safe "new.inuse", etc. - Used CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG and CONFIG_SYSFS condition for new counters. - atomic_long_t -> unsigned long v3->v4: - introduced new CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_PARTIAL to give a chance to be enabled for production use. - Merged PATCH 4 into PATCH 1. [Testing] There seems might be a little performance impact under extreme __slab_free() concurrent calls according to my tests. On my 32-cpu 2-socket physical machine: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1) perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- hackbench 20 thread 20000 == original, no patched Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.536050899 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.24% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.588049142 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.35% ) == patched with patch1~4 Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.670892273 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.29% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 20 thread 20000' (10 runs): 24.746755689 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.21% ) 2) perf stat --null --repeat 10 -- hackbench 32 thread 20000 == original, no patched Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.784911855 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.14% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.868687608 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.19% ) == patched with patch1~4 Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.681273015 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.21% ) Performance counter stats for 'hackbench 32 thread 20000' (10 runs): 39.681238459 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.09% ) Xunlei Pang (3): mm/slub: Introduce two counters for partial objects percpu: Export per_cpu_sum() mm/slub: Get rid of count_partial() include/linux/percpu-defs.h | 10 ++++ init/Kconfig | 13 +++++ kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 10 ---- mm/slab.h | 6 ++ mm/slub.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 5 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1