Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   =?UTF-8?q?=C5=81ukasz=20Stelmach?= <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
To:     alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
Cc:     l.stelmach@samsung.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
        b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] WIP: Introduce has_alarm method for rtc devices
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:19:35 +0100
Message-Id: <20210317081936.26583-1-l.stelmach@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <dleftjblbjc6w1.fsf%l.stelmach@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Organization: Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <dleftjblbjc6w1.fsf%l.stelmach@samsung.com>
        <CGME20210317081944eucas1p123bd27f3203c937d2969a66fb06d6d9e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
Precedence: bulk

The method enables determining whether a device supports
setting alarms or not before checking if the alarm to be
set is in the past; thus, provides clear indication of
support for alarms in a given configuration.

Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
---
How about has_alarm() method. It can be checked at the beginning of
__rtc_set_alarm() like RTC_HAS_ALARM flag I proposed above, but doesn't
need to be introduced in all drivers at once.

See the following message for the implementation in the ds1307 driver.

The first uie_unsupported patch should be kept regardless of these two.

 drivers/rtc/interface.c | 6 ++++++
 include/linux/rtc.h     | 1 +
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/interface.c b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
index 794a4f036b99..1eb180370d9b 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -412,6 +412,12 @@ static int __rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
 	time64_t now, scheduled;
 	int err;
 
+	if (!rtc->ops)
+		err = -ENODEV;
+	else if (rtc->ops->has_alarm &&
+		 !rtc->ops->has_alarm(rtc->dev.parent))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	err = rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
diff --git a/include/linux/rtc.h b/include/linux/rtc.h
index 22d1575e4991..ce9fc77ccd02 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtc.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtc.h
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct rtc_class_ops {
 	int (*alarm_irq_enable)(struct device *, unsigned int enabled);
 	int (*read_offset)(struct device *, long *offset);
 	int (*set_offset)(struct device *, long offset);
+	int (*has_alarm)(struct device *);
 };
 
 struct rtc_device;
-- 
2.26.2