Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: define stubs for clk_set_parent to fix
 compile testing
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>,
        John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        balbi@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, digetx@gmail.com,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
References: <20210316175725.79981-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
 <880d5e61-fec5-e7d6-7403-b1823c77b3c1@gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Message-ID: <856fbd45-67ae-fed2-97c4-b555993d5ae9@canonical.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:56:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <880d5e61-fec5-e7d6-7403-b1823c77b3c1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 17/03/2021 10:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On 16.03.2021 20:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> The Ralink MIPS platform does not use Common Clock Framework and does
>> not define certain clock operations leading to compile test failures:
>>
>>      /usr/bin/mips-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.o: in function `tegra_usb_phy_init':
>>      phy-tegra-usb.c:(.text+0x1dd4): undefined reference to `clk_get_parent'
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/ralink/clk.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c b/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>> index 2f9d5acb38ea..8387177a47ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>> @@ -70,6 +70,20 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_round_rate);
>>   
>> +int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
>> +{
>> +	WARN_ON(clk);
>> +	return -1;
> 
>     Shouldn't this be a proepr error code (-1 corresponds to -EPRERM)?

Could be ENODEV or EINVAL but all other stubs here and in ar7/clock.c
use -1. Do you prefer it then to have it inconsistent with others?

Best regards,
Krzysztof