Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp521006pxf; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:42:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwMWK/KkcRyevZxPLrfBeKnfpRonuhG0uVTeAJHtpjkClfBDWoXRQbkECWU9JiyyEUkYKiE X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c74a:: with SMTP id c10mr42606843eds.332.1615999329967; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615999329; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=idsbvgAIOKi70EXtI1z0ttovOfFSgi/B6rcXpUXbrp4nQPQYZy2LPz+uPHQ4B5nxtI 53D6R5BbLKGmwgn2Q/jw0ITvpVnGvxN95HGz7ALUUd3iSHuuMMRvT1lAboEs/poDx61P TMva+VkwpuVUTXgPRR8DM2H5MpYiAyZIOZh3iCgBI3uA19SIDVnGAPbffKPeCUUl8Xwb kJZBjnZDevVjc99vwn67Qys7LAt3wFvVAINSeGwFan1pgYVgSOntKm/n1SkIg2EI1wzO UkqLdSrMuRyRBlLLGvmZS7/ZEXjCOMAy7ipIcjL0FvIm/vOfn4g/CB7rhtR+lO4A/sTH YttQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=rl4Tg43zuCzMtlGTQDvpxMRrzcSfqv6gSCaCvBUZOvo=; b=XXEQ3IvVNYn+VkmCirH3L3EtIHrN8USnYn7SB+jsGkMXAZnfsoGr1gojubBXhoFjx6 6QPa017XixCKiMTkiG1oO8/dQglVqoUm24pFaUpuzNLiuJQo8xBx0tKj5h8ZAcGKw03y sDKy6ncGKb1yFIyhlTFcmociWYLHSern0N6EKUHqb4m1aKVKjHwUE1lNOYA3wdc5pXCQ h1m5Ngy6/zcZulk3fdfaDZC+oa6deJ+X3HY/2BmV6KtS123CkHTAFJmOii2f0esOIVSg bikoQtrJnUQUuUuu+VWhCJdSXel1UNBkUTVUdUx6psEQrTa2kWLuhW6+9FzMyF5+Ue95 qodw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v11si16469530eje.681.2021.03.17.09.41.44; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232288AbhCQQkF (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:40:05 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:58440 "EHLO mail.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232008AbhCQQjb (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:39:31 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) by mail.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 695684FC83BE2; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20210317.093926.47944613217780721.davem@davemloft.net> To: menglong8.dong@gmail.com Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, dong.menglong@zte.com.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND net-next] net: socket: use BIT() for MSG_* From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20210317013758.GA134033@roeck-us.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Menglong Dong Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:21:14 +0800 > Hello, > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:38 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:02:51AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > On Wednesday, March 17, 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> > > ... >> >> The problem is in net/packet/af_packet.c:packet_recvmsg(). This function, >> as well as all other rcvmsg functions, is declared as >> >> static int packet_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, >> int flags) >> >> MSG_CMSG_COMPAT (0x80000000) is set in flags, meaning its value is negative. >> This is then evaluated in >> >> if (flags & ~(MSG_PEEK|MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC|MSG_CMSG_COMPAT|MSG_ERRQUEUE)) >> goto out; > So what should I do? Revert this patch? Or fix the usages of 'flags'? I already reverted this patch from net-next to fix the regression.