Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [tip: locking/urgent] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify use_ww_ctx &
 ww_ctx handling
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>, x86@kernel.org
References: <20210316153119.13802-2-longman@redhat.com>
 <161598470257.398.5006518584847290113.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
 <YFH9Pw3kwCZC1UTB@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <85fbce04-c544-6041-6e7d-76f47b90e263@redhat.com>
 <YFIKWCUAZabBsji0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <bbfca577-b680-4c73-3f35-22179bd1a498@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:10:16 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YFIKWCUAZabBsji0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 3/17/21 9:55 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 09:43:20AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> Using gcc 8.4.1, the generated __mutex_lock function has the same size (with
>> last instruction at offset +5179) with or without this patch. Well, you can
>> say that this patch is an no-op wrt generated code.
> OK, then GCC has gotten better. Because back then I tried really hard
> but it wouldn't remove the if (ww_ctx) branches unless I had that extra
> const bool argument.
>
I think ww_mutex was merged in 2013. That is almost 8 years ago. It 
could still be the case that older gcc compilers may not generate the 
right code. I will try the RHEL7 gcc compiler (4.8.5) to see how it fares.

Cheers,
Longman