Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp670038pxf; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:01:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTQdG7oegpqqmx6gFdzxu4fION7kil3f2qsO+DjI9rG0/1uTWZlgTln3w9/LoBcDMzRxxC X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:bc81:: with SMTP id lv1mr37317125ejb.135.1616011311829; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:01:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616011311; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tdi4QhBcP06HYcaVzoOduA+book2iz7vnp8nc8XTBsVr1v54u8IAI3TuVevTSYg03G KSj8AofP4BWcnvlJ2UKeeSYeWtxDocIzg99/GenN+dbRUZe6WvKF+K+tMfRkRUhthlkL p3mjSIKDjKX4QXqd4LgH8Xe7+gaRCl8StKYehRaKSY682udWaoMoOAt/0Y/2cfmXKjM0 fRGvBuNJt47scSnQIPYV4RSOBnaP8fJDhvX/bW2zP4iixcSJdyPGnHNBQDLu9DYU99T7 fStI5laLA+THo73omUWJ0dA6Z4C+47fkcPDbTVyRMAZ9eh3CQfRLbUD4z4kbCpG1udnk xc0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=oC8GCTmvlsFkDJ1hgVzSWJ6fGOhXyrj/G6vJTANh9M8=; b=c5Fh3GGgOaP/+y8CrE33pDpaZ3vida0I1lfAQHfEWz/c29bcOZ/LcO7lR97Quz4bo+ 1ZD9rXGOvuRKh882DHMYOML1BWEr2SkCVpdfX9oabY+NFU1ZcQVVigRCaU5I1emd45n9 yECH4R/V+PJQU7/oRMaZHpBdAJroCGUED6WE5ED5UWGoqIf0lSedL4/ydS/6QDydbtGJ pKOwLugWVlMIuFyYdggleWlMkHO6SWVkQQMYyl/UAHsIFC5fHD2TM1W5Lw2esxf3HJTL 9+1BjaAEF5/7PMRPv+t/acQ5TURn/5xcUgUcAUK6pM4FzUTBQTxUucNUjNYqG/ISUum9 w5VA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b="C3bq/xcL"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k14si16957056ejp.62.2021.03.17.13.01.08; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b="C3bq/xcL"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233317AbhCQT7I (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:59:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41678 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232738AbhCQT6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:58:40 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5020BC06174A; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=oC8GCTmvlsFkDJ1hgVzSWJ6fGOhXyrj/G6vJTANh9M8=; b=C3bq/xcLSTWNKn1DdXGc9MAbWW fCr5UDHnFBlDxsz5Zs1UKZGPsQet+8IBqS+ZdB+wE0cFiFF8MCvhlRg7mRdIzSpd6d2tFmvHPzK0c l3g6CjXPdAgPmNKvmhAQXxexruIHJYpAQqNWDcseryOORJGbsOMzddTPIsoMSSTz5Z3tTbl2WE9W2 1iLQSnwrEMd0EDAa2PwEuftQnXuDZLf+EnqgSJq/WgSCrvw2zG6ewwTOI4bZeP2rSRIL13jg6skOH cOsWf2XeVlLZD28QP1OHB+HWpnfW4SJftzMQt/YRBc6IUFrwzhlEJOxW46JUkCw3172u/vQRw4dr9 yTjLBZ2A==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lMcJP-003qKE-Hm; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:58:36 +0000 Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1D54980BEF; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:58:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:58:34 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Waiman Long Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: locking/urgent] locking/ww_mutex: Treat ww_mutex_lock() like a trylock Message-ID: <20210317195834.GV4746@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20210316153119.13802-4-longman@redhat.com> <161598470197.398.8903908266426306140.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <36d26109-f08a-6254-2fd3-ad1a28fcc260@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36d26109-f08a-6254-2fd3-ad1a28fcc260@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:32:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > On 3/17/21 1:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > +# define __DEP_MAP_WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \ > > > + , .dep_map = { \ > > > + .key = &(class).mutex_key, \ > > > + .name = (class).mutex_name, \ > > ,name = #class "_mutex", \ > > > > and it 'works', but shees! > > The name string itself may be duplicated for multiple instances of > DEFINE_WW_MUTEX(). Do you want to keep DEFINE_WW_MUTEX() or just use > ww_mutex_init() for all? So linkers can merge literals, but no guarantee. But yeah, lets just kill the thing, less tricky macro crud to worry about. > I notice that the problem with DEFINE_WW_MUTEX is that the ww_mutex > themselves has null key instead of the same key from the ww_class as with > ww_mutex_init(). Correct.