Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp189191pxf; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:41:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQwpJZwyTEl5V+U+RqmSkpjmDdCr5bUkUf3RNng43X0QVsLWGI40WM1LxShomSwwmAqhDW X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2cd1:: with SMTP id r17mr17141265ejr.429.1616035313032; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:41:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616035313; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ami6YlOwaiRsIG1UEV6vd8eg4w4H1JZAHALqrxBrq1lEl/5OnXkgKKg+XSVWuFzXn6 HIy4XbcGyfuMiZdgWJ/WKxkJgK/Z4KfOtarUXPOHN+NzouT95pNF/dQpHm6X1kDBDnq7 yum3cSCpNLKf5FoLZpaf2APKV6KznGOmgBhEycIhbWfgMNM1Nz6fEe4Cv3kLR4nj6R9n sCQ1PQXPDXIkJDywL9qoPlpxUH8s6MD4C3+Y2rlsOs1M2RQGINRucWhtTMi/RYMdujVO 2RByPXFZbIu6TP5c8XQavKBJWkHejamGCrv4hcIx1MYJknV0Eb6ToL60j8fcL26tVuuD Z2mQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=9rb+IjpoH2LxzqRWtlLUUQ+4OIMSApIuntG9XgLfIqI=; b=fzdYZL/+MQt+ERSYSguI6lw5MTibYiukp19KxgD47FuEFf2dcgcThn6r4soKEYYy6D CXD4CUpYes40QjnS85c+wF1thdGEFkh2uauirmeynRXchoygRfkXpFYIieShmSzeYgmv buKh3CVrG0nypDViSGUqTuM1EMwrVIjDvVuBY2RNAt5qYZ3ilmjv62hSghWuLOU+2eZ1 g9gfPTNQhkGp4JnsEgUF/sxB8LVDeNwWTxxMhyQ91BNq8GMoeOy5IPo/vKWOUCwFSeUR UhN4zv2DBPxf4HaQI9VXCZf4YDluNCTj7eu109FQwmeNmyJqRAU6bzxgRhEcjD4UymgA /zNg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a21si493009ejd.654.2021.03.17.19.41.29; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230433AbhCRCjP (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:39:15 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:42913 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230341AbhCRCiw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:38:52 -0400 IronPort-SDR: M+/tCsqj12SFvB0pGqrmDLuIyztMbiwz0rGwT8VelPRbkxTX50sdfpx6P7KBqMcf3RQ+pe1KF4 mB7tg2HaE+TA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9926"; a="177180910" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,257,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="177180910" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2021 19:38:52 -0700 IronPort-SDR: sekA4qS1NWWjh9+u9VP2O4uKHjKSpobxFH/1mS4Lnfzy9ayOm2R/OK7nCZfsTJ9cOaX8PpEw8V utKjXGD/rLOw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,257,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="450315247" Received: from xsang-optiplex-9020.sh.intel.com (HELO xsang-OptiPlex-9020) ([10.239.159.140]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2021 19:38:50 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:37:03 +0800 From: Oliver Sang To: Nikolay Borisov Cc: David Sterba , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [btrfs] 5297199a8b: xfstests.btrfs.220.fail Message-ID: <20210318023703.GB10304@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> References: <20210309084953.GD12057@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <5e0b9f39-9c4d-5b56-68ba-7a6283dc560d@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5e0b9f39-9c4d-5b56-68ba-7a6283dc560d@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Nikolay, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:36:52AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 9.03.21 г. 10:49 ч., kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9): > > > > commit: 5297199a8bca12b8b96afcbf2341605efb6005de ("btrfs: remove inode number cache feature") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > > > > > in testcase: xfstests > > version: xfstests-x86_64-d41dcbd-1_20201218 > > with following parameters: > > > > disk: 6HDD > > fs: btrfs > > test: btrfs-group-22 > > ucode: 0x28 > > > > test-description: xfstests is a regression test suite for xfs and other files ystems. > > test-url: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git > > > > > > on test machine: 8 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz with 8G memory > > > > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace): > > > > > > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sdb1 > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sdb1 > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 export FSTYP=btrfs > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 mkdir /fs/scratch -p > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 export SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sdb2 /dev/sdb3 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdb5 /dev/sdb6" > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 sed "s:^:btrfs/:" //lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/btrfs-group-22 > > 2021-03-09 04:13:26 ./check btrfs/220 btrfs/221 btrfs/222 btrfs/223 btrfs/224 btrfs/225 btrfs/226 btrfs/227 > > FSTYP -- btrfs > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-hsw-d01 5.10.0-rc7-00162-g5297199a8bca #1 SMP Sat Feb 27 21:06:26 CST 2021 > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb2 /fs/scratch > > > > btrfs/220 - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.out.bad) > > --- tests/btrfs/220.out 2021-01-14 07:40:58.000000000 +0000 > > +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//btrfs/220.out.bad 2021-03-09 04:13:32.880794446 +0000 > > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > > QA output created by 220 > > +Unexepcted mount options, checking for 'inode_cache,relatime,space_cache,subvol=/,subvolid=5' in 'rw,relatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/' using 'inode_cache' > > > Given that the commit removes the inode_cache feature that's expected, I > assume you need to adjust your fstests configuration to not use > inode_cache. Thanks for information, we will change test options accordingly.