Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:38:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:37:57 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:48185 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:37:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 23:37:31 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 vs resizerfs vs xfs Message-ID: <20011107233731.N1504@niksula.cs.hut.fi> In-Reply-To: <20011107213837.F26218@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <20011107141157.L5922@lynx.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011107141157.L5922@lynx.no>; from adilger@turbolabs.com on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:11:57PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:11:57PM -0700, [Andreas Dilger] said: > > If you have an open but unlinked file, then ext3 will delete this file at > mount/fsck time (unlike reiserfs which leaves it around wasting space). Is this really still true for reiserfs? Is there a way to get rid of them? reiserfsck? I had this vague impression that this bug had been dealt with but... -- v -- v@iki.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/