Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:53:21 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] devtmpfs: fix placement of complete() call
Message-ID: <YFNNQSTTeN8wRDhR@kroah.com>
References: <20210312103027.2701413-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
 <b9db4269-2e7e-76ec-4f54-e871d3798d45@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b9db4269-2e7e-76ec-4f54-e871d3798d45@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 01:44:04PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 12/03/2021 11.30, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > Calling complete() from within the __init function is wrong -
> > theoretically, the init process could proceed all the way to freeing
> > the init mem before the devtmpfsd thread gets to execute the return
> > instruction in devtmpfs_setup().
> 
> Greg, ping? Also for the other one.

I'll pick this up for my tree, give me a chance to catch up, there's no
rush with this one :)

thanks,

greg k-h