Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp577256pxf; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeXkWqmNaZZtuue+iV4XYCu3kYEja4Bsl1N+yrRkRLHJii9EMeJqjm/U+Cs2SEkHzdf68Q X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7637:: with SMTP id jy23mr39899602ejc.12.1616077494702; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616077494; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EhbabS2jTJgCgLC5FJsoIL7qtiwriqaj/4JkD8IAgnyslMEIJ4Ka0c7UIyIn2HtaA+ w/Xg9rVN1Uzv+MVgMfDHbvYNiB+HhWxK0SFtrPCU2jv940b0/45vSqXliftX/itGECB0 xeq09StIjr73sU+gudIe/tTMeskk5EO/i7zFFaytklcVr0xxk4u3Ua4qY0QhAZIrL6NQ 0O/snWlCExUdDp7iK+M5voHoh863NC4bTgy3aaRobSX4N6co5BHp78Ptml5kzG3gOBvo nhqaM7ntr9ir+ep9amS72s7xXf73EZqH+PN1qt8cpgOHk1pfO81J8ZvqDUPxoQwhTFHf xpKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=KOdq8BV0gXqxM5Vqnz2RvNgUvy5SdxfV/eRCgGtRHuc=; b=YYroQkTfhThH1w/nzAhvPVDBaIG8fpNptTZ6uywj3Oe4fO8g6xBE1CDZMN0VnwbmBO gkcKFcaOxu2IeysCc7AD5ISkUN8uNm1p0/Mmj6beg/Aoyubs+lyJtpzcXkCKXdtvfyaX 7l+fMx9aOseICl1KDKfstaqQkHIDKQewFSZQlSEeVMFb29zuXwoTWqtUn+IEmid5p/ew 9rq0k21lhZiiaDiMiU1veZzcCfQ7eWR89UliuEWjkQtgB1eQm7WscoiVKKFzHqOyXY+R VeqJYccRMAzlH2otzDsXmaJma/4WYQqpnYDO/ElUv7Y69GB2H1l6NFjB+XzrhkGJFQ60 fYUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=gisaDKEH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t13si1711919ejf.189.2021.03.18.07.24.31; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=gisaDKEH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230477AbhCROVV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:21:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41654 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231229AbhCROVJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:21:09 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7821E64EF9; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:21:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616077269; bh=fIdVVkOWf8byJSCanlFq6jbRjFI1tGNgEbHl2JUMFcE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=gisaDKEHd5ULsXqZAK58LwuAcwki1SzbLOEgEfz7vJ3zHioz4lEvM/6jVUYi3D9i0 ofp8v9PPnneUt1HYpzSynoQwMEXOCSGH4+3VUMjQdHlnfvOaQIMfuGKkTITSgizsqW OAtFrFu7FyMlRuikftqJwvwWldVHLTb/CqwIUazzSfD3Mykl/ZzY32lkid8Yl0QSuB ut1PJDKK/IfCVtAJ9lJTvEa8exQpKXJKh7nuxKlotrgz2uArtZHfvulfdCK6UrngbN EW0BFU+cJoLEWAC6GDAUoa8kgzQXjXqoyJeN+Tqjx5BtFvXLZJpcsfxauJhtOhh66C IwS6qxV6DUzoQ== Received: by mail-oi1-f177.google.com with SMTP id x78so1719428oix.1; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:21:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532H55E/UQlXlwlWO+vea5XzekQEirJYbmQChrkDwXNt47855D/+ lzY3oPTsZzjOJGxcFCCK0drwNKZuAESuQT61sPc= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1a01:: with SMTP id a1mr3241169oia.33.1616077268763; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:21:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9efc652df2b8d6b53d9acb170eb7c9ca3938dfef.1615920441.git.tom.saeger@oracle.com> <20210318104433.GA6959@willie-the-truck> <20210318112859.GA25002@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20210318112859.GA25002@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:20:57 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: arm64/acpi : clarify arm64 support of IBFT To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Will Deacon , Tom Saeger , Linux Doc Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Tai , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Catalin Marinas , Randy Dunlap , Al Stone , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ahs3@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 12:29, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > [+ Al, Ard] > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:44:33AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > [+Lorenzo] > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:50:41PM -0600, Tom Saeger wrote: > > > In commit 94bccc340710 ("iscsi_ibft: make ISCSI_IBFT dependson ACPI instead > > > of ISCSI_IBFT_FIND") Kconfig was disentangled to make ISCSI_IBFT selection > > > not depend on x86. > > > > > > Update arm64 acpi documentation, changing IBFT support status from > > > "Not Supported" to "Optional". > > > Opportunistically re-flow paragraph for changed lines. > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1563475054-10680-1-git-send-email-thomas.tai@oracle.com/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger > > > --- > > > Documentation/arm64/acpi_object_usage.rst | 10 +++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > Lorenzo, please could you ack the change below if you're happy with it? > > If so, I can take it as a fix. > > I don't see any issue with this patch, more so given that the IBFT > legacy discovery method was decoupled from the ACPI table method, > so it looks sound on ARM64. > > However, I would like to get Al and Ard opinions on this to make sure > there is not something I am missing (in particular wrt the rationale > behind the "Not Supported" in the docs). > Both the original change and this documentation change look fine to me. Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel