Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp736410pxf; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:19:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxK/r59n8SQZtZduCue8jkCEoyI3LJYS/8wlqSqCqlUn44FCIRTa18XuedMkC1NIszM17R8 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cf17:: with SMTP id a23mr5122988edy.30.1616087994591; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1616087994; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LQZOYrnKhBmUNs9z/nVgg94GXD4SpVAuRGOVDWfO8c+Dk8QpHNgqzY8QVua5AsG2d5 jGjSdHeW8+FAgkrBHu8MOnixBg7WMNOh0VUuQLXLqPv6NXGQJntbYWMie79sj8e57svf UdG6W2vcDY7HN6sZF16gCgKsAfanOqO53yERezWt6vqTKC+ULk0c5KG2r8btuqrwyR6W p4r+T14b5TErYq6Q/Xc+yNVjMOzElXdCI5UyHkGRz0mp8yVPYWjGiLK7vE/4Kaizs7/j 9Q7+zzvaKPbRxRvzIzE3vZueQv1+xgT2ZC637kiYuxCtt6EdcmDHDoNoEE2RaeA9pTp0 smnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=iDp//PKAV4Sjo56KnAqgLYa0tid7A8GS2x1jiL572RM=; b=T6MmZX8mkFtBRVKhCfWwDQWOJhVm8qTqNFHCaotnqNfkrOvy2c8T4sUvWXE2k/DFwp VU5iEMO0zGgc7JklRCGL1PZxiKdJc2wwnYhuSamGZZdyKd8rK74jYhx0SWu8BuSRrLvX i+k+SCyUIOJ+VxjeADrtu4Vl60ztYob5NKBd2kE2HTXCzYv/2YBA8SJF2SQa+lHFpfVO JMZfn60yQXEFVSrO7I08pFnXSOd/SgdJSbzXBYHEc9GO0bOEKtRRTjhIrJokSZExUm9w cIis0TKgd7wqYQGjjq97IjWA66AR+hNuM9SZxoUvTOvxW41AB4BZpXKEd2/bqWJaDbV3 z0Fg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HI7lJteH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si2205531ejh.0.2021.03.18.10.19.30; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HI7lJteH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229720AbhCRRSB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:18:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43682 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229732AbhCRRRq (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:17:46 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1D5464EF6; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:17:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1616087862; bh=NUnPDKzhQeaSoqgrIqhWRHlq+IUR51l4CsCRg8M4VCE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HI7lJteHsflfTFzGXv7EWlusKHSAslONvXEL+tT01xU5gm4ulM/uW5Rrp3ugbXbkm JtNeEPEuwN5pOLkof/GHvk+nFXVwvC/dW2ZCmfDCRZK0nGoGYVXOAhdezAiGzRSVYx TwwX40FMevDIMw46jwBmGZnS0NjTpSQbN2qivPfLVm9rBoIv0JbIX1x0R07F7Kb2yd paCh9thU8rVmYsoiPi1jzaNjBfXjMZ5cJus5ZvQh6sW0O82nIkAYgiP6KTxJDTu6v7 gt/NADZNwAe/t/7Ch3A94ww9/K5UJYAd7sG5iIf3aH9YsUM4cYypWYIGc8ChWfdol4 6vrQJ44Bqku4A== Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:17:40 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chao@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] f2fs: fix to avoid selecting full segment w/ {AT,}SSR allocator Message-ID: References: <20210220094052.64905-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210220094052.64905-1-yuchao0@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/20, Chao Yu wrote: > In cp disabling mode, there could be a condition > - target segment has 128 ckpt valid blocks > - GC migrates 128 valid blocks to other segment (segment is still in > dirty list) > - GC migrates 384 blocks to target segment (segment has 128 cp_vblocks > and 384 vblocks) > - If GC selects target segment via {AT,}SSR allocator, however there is > no free space in targe segment. > > Fixes: 4354994f097d ("f2fs: checkpoint disabling") > Fixes: 093749e296e2 ("f2fs: support age threshold based garbage collection") > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 + > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index ed7807103c8e..9c753eff0814 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -3376,6 +3376,7 @@ block_t f2fs_get_unusable_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi); > int f2fs_disable_cp_again(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t unusable); > void f2fs_release_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi); > int f2fs_npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool for_ra); > +bool segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno); > void f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi); > void f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi); > void f2fs_restore_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi); > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 86ba8ed0b8a7..a1d8062cdace 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -392,10 +392,6 @@ static void add_victim_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > if (p->gc_mode == GC_AT && > get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0) > return; > - > - if (p->alloc_mode == AT_SSR && > - get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks == 0) > - return; > } > > for (i = 0; i < sbi->segs_per_sec; i++) > @@ -736,6 +732,19 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > if (gc_type == BG_GC && test_bit(secno, dirty_i->victim_secmap)) > goto next; > > + if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) { > + /* > + * to avoid selecting candidate which has below valid > + * block distribution: > + * partial blocks are valid and all left ones are valid > + * in previous checkpoint. > + */ > + if (p.alloc_mode == SSR || p.alloc_mode == AT_SSR) { > + if (!segment_has_free_slot(sbi, segno)) > + goto next; Do we need to change this to check free_slot instead of get_ckpt_valid_blocks()? 732 if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) && 733 get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno) && 734 p.alloc_mode == LFS)) > + } > + } > + > if (is_atgc) { > add_victim_entry(sbi, &p, segno); > goto next; > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index 2d5a82c4ca15..deaf57e13125 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -2650,6 +2650,26 @@ static void __refresh_next_blkoff(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > seg->next_blkoff++; > } > > +bool segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno) > +{ > + struct sit_info *sit = SIT_I(sbi); > + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno); > + int entries = SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long); > + unsigned long *target_map = SIT_I(sbi)->tmp_map; > + unsigned long *ckpt_map = (unsigned long *)se->ckpt_valid_map; > + unsigned long *cur_map = (unsigned long *)se->cur_valid_map; > + int i, pos; > + > + down_write(&sit->sentry_lock); > + for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) > + target_map[i] = ckpt_map[i] | cur_map[i]; > + > + pos = __find_rev_next_zero_bit(target_map, sbi->blocks_per_seg, 0); > + up_write(&sit->sentry_lock); > + > + return pos < sbi->blocks_per_seg; > +} > + > /* > * This function always allocates a used segment(from dirty seglist) by SSR > * manner, so it should recover the existing segment information of valid blocks > -- > 2.29.2