Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] alpha: use libata instead of the legacy ide driver
References: <20210318045706.200458-1-hch@lst.de>
        <20210318045706.200458-2-hch@lst.de>
        <YFLrLwjZubWUvA2J@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
        <20210318060724.GA29117@lst.de> <yw1x1rccie35.fsf@mansr.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:03:42 +0000
In-Reply-To: <yw1x1rccie35.fsf@mansr.com> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22M=E5ns_Rullg?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E5rd=22's?= message of "Thu,
        18 Mar 2021 17:09:02 +0000")
Message-ID: <yw1xwnu4gwzl.fsf@mansr.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

M?ns Rullg?rd <mans@mansr.com> writes:

> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:54:55AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:56:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> > Switch the alpha defconfig from the legacy ide driver to libata.
>>> 
>>> Umm...  I don't have an IDE alpha box in a usable shape (fans on
>>> CPU module shat themselves), and it would take a while to resurrect
>>> it, but I remember the joy it used to cause in some versions.
>>> 
>>> Do you have reports of libata variants of drivers actually tested on
>>> those?
>>
>> No, I haven't.  The whole point is that we're not going to keep 40000
>> lines of code around despite notice for users that don't exist or
>> care.  If there is a regression we'll fix it, but we're not going to
>> make life miserable just because we can.
>
> The pata_ali driver works fine on my UP1500 machine, unless something
> broke recently.  I'll build the latest kernel and report back.

5.11.7 seems fine too.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd